Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Of course nobody wants to see that happen? (Score 1) 274

Really?

Because it seems to me that if I can be put on a sex offender registry and/or jailed for up to the rest of my life (possibly really short and painful life) simply for owning a phone or email address to which a picture was sent, or god forbid browsing a porn site and they happen to be in the gallery, then the creation and distribution of said photo better be illegal. It better be very very illegal.

No such law should be prosecutable unless intent, on your part, to receive, keep or distribute such material can be shown without doubt.

Comment Re:misleading (Score 1) 72

This is a misleading story and summary.

I got the impression the police were distributing this as some kind of internet filter, and secretly using it to monitor your computer.
It's not.
The are advertising it for what it is. A keylogger... so you can spy on your kids.
It's a crappy piece of software, and the company that produced it made some disreputable marketing claims.
The police are not using it to spy on you.

I have a 6yr old. The way I monitor his internet activity is simple. The computers in the living room right next to the couch. I can see everything he's doing, any time hes on it. I have the password so he can't log on without me entering it for him. Every game he plays or site he visits I go checkout myself. Btw, Adventure Time Battle party is his favorite and it's actually pretty fun for adults to.

Do you go to his friends' places with him and monitor over his shoulder then too?

My kid is ten and has a good head on his shoulders. I've discussed the risks of the net with him and we've discussed several times what he should avoid.

Teach your kids and they'll be much better protected everywhere they access the net, not just when you're sitting with them.

Comment Re:Why is Boeing responsible? (Score 1) 142

I think that's between Boeing and Honeywell, no? Honeywell didn't supply the jets with the displays in them - Boeing did. Now if the displays weren't up to the spec under which they were sold, then Boeing probably has a good case to go back to Honeywell and demand compensation. On the other hand, if being unaffected by wifi was never part of the specs or the deal, then that's Boeing's fault and they should have to eat it.

Either way, the airlines should have to deal with Boeing and not with Honeywell.

And to continue that train of thought, why should Boeing have to eat it if there was no law or other legal requirement in place at the time the planes were sold requiring displays to be resistant to wifi (or other)?

Comment Re:Another jackboot stomp on the way to facism (Score 1) 126

So you think without guns, there would be more liberty?

Do you think that with guns, there is more?

Other than the actual liberty to carry guns itself, such weapons don't make any difference at all in the true liberty, or lack thereof, that Americans have.

Carrying a gun does not protect you, as a US citizen, should the government suspect, even wrongly, that you are a terrorist.
Carrying a gun does not keep you from having your privacy invaded by the NSA.
Carrying a gun does not stop the TSA from groping you when you travel.
Carrying guns would not have helped the Occupy Wall Street protestors (regardless of if you believe they were right or wrong they still had the right to demonstrate peaceably which was denied them by the coordinated efforts of the Federal government and local police agencies).

Do you actually believe that the small arms you are allowed to carry would make any difference should you choose to revolt against an oppressive government?

Guns are not going to save what is left of the liberties of Americans.

Comment Re:Don't freak out. (Score 1) 475

"The best means of prevention are similar to those you would practice to prevent the common cold or the flu, and it starts at your bathroom sink. Thoroughly washing your hands, and practicing good hygiene with soap and water, is a good first step to preventing infection."

Yes, that's been very effective at stopping the common cold from spreading.

Do you think that the health workers that have been infected have not been washing their hands perhaps?

I'm not saying that your advice is wrong, but I don't think that it's going to stop the spread of Ebola any better than it stops the common cold from spreading.

Comment Re:Contagiousness (Score 1) 475

Past Ebola incubation periods were under 3 days. This one can be dormant up to 3 weeks. That means you can be a carrier and not know until 3 weeks later. In a place where the health care system is top notch and any outbreak can be contained in a relatively short time, that doesn't mean much. But combine that with crappy health care and ignorant masses, you've got a perfect storm where people who have it don't know they have it or don't want to get treated and thus get other people infected, who then travel somewhere else before showing symptoms and getting other people infected.

This is why it's not as big a deal in the U.S. if it gets here. The people who show signs are quickly quarrantined. The people who are close to them are quarrantined. They'll quarrantine entire towns if necessary.

The only issue is if it hits a big city, and people aren't aware of their symptoms, and it starts spreading. But it's hard to not be aware of your symptoms when you're bleeding out of every orfice. And we do have experimental treatments, worst case. They've already been shown to work. We just don't know if they won't cause worse things to happen in the edge cases, like massive blood clots for certain people or some such.

Two points to consider.
1) The symptoms of Ebola are flu like and do not start with bleeding out so people will not know, or want to admit, that they are deathly ill - so no different than elsewhere.
2) Americans will try and escape any quarantine zone thinking that they know better than the authorities.

I suggest you try and get over your 'Americans are perfect and nothing can harm us' mentality.

Comment Re:Another jackboot stomp on the way to facism (Score 2) 126

... the presence of personal armaments everywhere ...

Actually personal firearms are an example of the existence of personal rights and freedoms, something that totalitarian regimes tend not to allow. The 2nd amendment is every bit as important as the other amendments.

Keep believing that. The only reasons that Americans are still allowed to carry guns is (a) to enrich those making and selling them, (b) because the police have bigger ones (which also enriches those making and selling them) and (c) because those making the laws today generally don't give a shit if average Americans kill each other.

Comment Re:FP? (Score 1) 942

I have a feeling any "conversion" would be about as difficult to handle as your cable company changing the channel lineup around. Perhaps a few weeks of grumbling, but eventually you get used to it.

I for one am more impressed that a country who's citizens believe they are in the greatest and best country in the world, able to put men on the moon and build up an economy and military might that rules the world, somehow figure themselves incapable to achieve what 42 other countries around the world have done in the past 300 years.

You're confusing 'incapable' with just not giving enough of a shit to bother changing.

Comment Re: Umm no (Score 1) 470

However if space battles are fought at 10,000,0000km then you have quite a lot of notice of the missile coming as there is no horizon to hide behind and no sea to skim. If the missiles manoeuvre, you can see it and it is telegraphing its attack and movement direction with hours if not days and weeks.

Depends on the speed of your missiles relative to the speed of light (and assuming nothing is faster than light).

The time between possible notification time (speed of light through space + recognition time) and when they arrive is reduced proportionately.

If (for ease of calculation) your missiles were traveling at the speed of light then there would be no advance notice possible at all.

Comment Re:Worse than Heartbleed? (Score 1) 318

Bah. Just replace bash then - or upgrade it. Read about this bug today (on a linux machine), tested for it - and it was fixed already. The bug may be a bad one, but the fix is out already. Got it through a standard upgrade of arch, no specific action to fix this. Fix bash, and all that cgi/ssh is as safe as ever.

Trivial to exploit - but trivially fixed too.

The question becomes what was done to the target before it was fixed.

Locking the door after the bad guy is in the house doesn't help much.

Comment Re:Typical Engineering mistake (Score 1) 421

So, from the video you can see it clearly bend around the volume cutouts. Then even mentions that. I suspect it was engineered to survive flexing in that direction... and then later they moved/changed where the volume cutouts would be. If those buttons were on top, this wouldn't be a problem.

Form over function is always a loser.

Not if it gets you laid.

Slashdot Top Deals

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...