With net neutrality, piracy and privacy issues... we should indeed expect a "new" internet by 2020.

IPv6 will be the rule of law of course, for one base reason:
IPV4 can not support the growth in emerging markets

and two (interconnected) reasons
- it allows more consumers to connect with more devices
- it allows better tracking - which is a crucial pillar of today's internet sponsorship

Finally, it is the only "partially working" solution today, commercial routers support it, and there is no other protocol that meet today's need and is implemented in most vendors next gen solutions: it has already been tested and accepted by the network's core infrastructure suppliers.

Of course, some custom industrial solutions might need more time to be replaced, but "on the shelf" solutions will be IPV6 before 2020!

SO YES... IPv6 will be mostly integrated (for consumers) before 2020...
In corporations, IPV4 will remain a compatibility issue for a long time, in a similar way that system admins still have to deal with coax cables and VAX or SPARC systems today.

Maybe it is time for the community to take on its shoulders and fork the project...

While all these threads apply to today's public standards, it is still very possible for a motivated person to send strongly coded messages on internet, there are three simple rules to respect:
- Use a secured host which is not connected to any network (try openbsd for example)
- Use many encryption layers, and one passworded key (like I did in https://github.com/jupiter126/... )
- Send the pass and archives by secure ways... (ex: the pass on paper, and the key split in 128 different messages)

Encryption is not dead... it is the future, but it is one step behind decryption at this very moment.

At least with Gentoo, I expect to have a bit of fun for some updates!

Net neutrality can be approached with two purposes:
- Be neutral about what is allowed on internet (Block specific content)
- Be neutral about who is allowed on internet (Block specific sites)
Content distributors are interested in blocking specific content (MCAA, RIAA, ...), infrastructure providers are interested in blocking specific sites (netflix, ...): it is a battle for money.

Human nature dictates us to be creative to reach our objectives.
These laws will thus only accelerate the birth and growth of new networks, which their creators might surprisingly base on the shortcomings of what they miss in the existing one.
As users will be motivated to search for alternatives, demand will be raising, and while TOR is only a "first generation" secure network and its use remains marginal, these laws will help these kind of networks to go mainstream.
They will then try to block these networks, triggering further evolution, back to the chicken and the egg.

On the meantime, illegal organisations will benefit from those new mainstream technologies, and our dear agencies might need to gear up a bit ^^
Now for the funding: Taxes.

And this is how you lost the war for money, even if you did not buy their content or bypass their architecture \o/

If they want to have fun decrypting, lets at least give them a worthy challenge ;)

I send myself files coded with over 10 different algorythms (use of a bash script to automatise crypt/decrypt.
code is there: https://github.com/jupiter126/...

I asked myself the same question a few months ago, and came up with a homemade solution. The solution I adopted to make up for the lack of trust of vendors and algorithms, has been to layer many implementations of many algorithms to encrypt my files... this result is much more intensive encryption procedures, but the data feels safer - as long as we believe at least one vendor or one algoritm were not compromised. I scripted the method in bash: https://github.com/jupiter126/...

Following the same rule, and as the church was wrong for condoms we can safely assume assume they are wrong too for god, creation, and all that bullshit. Same player shoot again \o/