Comment Re:Isn't that anti-science? (Score 1) 1055
And when the climate change followers start to call for faith despite missing data, who is unscientific?
And when the climate change followers start to call for faith despite missing data, who is unscientific?
Seriously, Mozilla has something like 30% marketshare and IIRC Google gave them 300 Million. So they only manage to gain 3% (= 1/10 of Firefox users) with a conservative stable version, then that would be 30 million. Surely that would be worth the trouble.
Is nobody in the community smelling the money?
Obama has already made several steps towards war, and to say that the drone-campaign will continue is just the last step.
People were furious about Bush lies to start the wars. Obama has found the solution! Just don't talk about it, the people at home don't seem to care.
Doesn't anybody find it strange that There are no protests against Obama's wars?
Must not criticize this Nobel Peace Price winner, it would make quite a lot of people feel very stupid when they first treat him as the next messiah ("Jesus was also a community organizer", remember?) and then critizise him.
Sure, as soon as "him" comes forward. Tell me, do you see any "hims" in the 2012 Presidential race so far?
Well, CNN has publicly admitted that they want to kick out Ron Paul of the race.
That's because he has a consistent voting record of voting against government growth and wars.
Microsoft is basically telling their customers that they don't want their business.
http://in-other-news.com/2011/Microsoft-We-have-no-obligation-to-return-data-to-you-
What we need is stability, we need less versions (preferrably one per year or even less than that).
http://in-other-news.com/2011/The_problem_with_Firefox_and_how_it_could_be_fixed
They still behave like they had a monopoly. But that days are over. The tactics that worked 10 years ago are now hurting them. And they don't seem to realize it.
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.