GPL requires you make your chances available under the GPL license while MIT makes almost no requirements.

You can easily put the gun somewhere safe. The lock does not need to be on the gun itself. Requiring fingerprint locks on all guns would increase the costs of guns for everyone when I would guess that most gun owners wouldn't want the feature (unlike airbags). Also, if you have children in the house, they should be taught gun safety and that if they even touch any gun without your permission, there will be hell to pay. Hell, they should probably be taught the same even if you don't keep a gun in the house. In any case, if I was going to use an electronic lock, I would much rather use a RFID lock over a fingerprint lock. There would be a much smaller chance for error.

I just realize the timeout isn't configurable. Didn't it used to be? I could have sworn that you used to be able to require a password everytime or just once every X minutes.

No. Just no. Put yourself in imminent position on needing a gun for self-defense. Do you really want a gun that might not fire not because it can't read your fingerprints accurately enough?

Wouldn't that depend on how they use Facebook?

Of course a single letter typo gets five replies.

Pray you will have internet and get an steaming upload app?

The machines wouldn't be fully exposed. They should have their own firewalls. There just wouldn't be a need for port forwarding and NAT traversals.

Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

I would mod you up if I could. I always thought the same thing. A requirement for common carrier protections should be neutrality.

There is not reason you can't have a ipv6 gateways/routers that filter incoming traffic. It would defeat a significant benefit of IPv6 but you can do it.

True. But the first encourages the second.

If the government wanted to control over-population, they would consider programs that reward those the have no or less than two biological children. Right now, we do the opposite. We give tax breaks to those that have children. A more politcal suicide approach would to also require those that are on any form of government aid to engage in some form of birth control. Instead of the government forcing everyone one to do something, they are making a trade: resources for your ability to reproduce.

I don't know what database technology they are using but if they are using SQL, they are probably using an ENUM: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E179... https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refm... http://www.postgresql.org/docs...

He was talking about the fact that only the unveristy educated pay the tax. Those able will simply avoid traditional universities for another form of education that is not taxed.