Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Stephen Fry: An Open Letter to David Cameron and the IOC (stephenfry.com)

mar.kolya writes: I write in the earnest hope that all those with a love of sport and the Olympic spirit will consider the stain on the Five Rings that occurred when the 1936 Berlin Olympics proceeded under the exultant aegis of a tyrant who had passed into law, two years earlier, an act which singled out for special persecution a minority whose only crime was the accident of their birth. In his case he banned Jews from academic tenure or public office, he made sure that the police turned a blind eye to any beatings, thefts or humiliations afflicted on them, he burned and banned books written by them. He claimed they “polluted” the purity and tradition of what it was to be German, that they were a threat to the state, to the children and the future of the Reich. He blamed them simultaneously for the mutually exclusive crimes of Communism and for the controlling of international capital and banks. He blamed them for ruining the culture with their liberalism and difference. The Olympic movement at that time paid precisely no attention to this evil and proceeded with the notorious Berlin Olympiad, which provided a stage for a gleeful Führer and only increased his status at home and abroad. It gave him confidence. All historians are agreed on that. What he did with that confidence we all know. — See more at: http://www.stephenfry.com/2013/08/07/an-open-letter-to-david-cameron-and-the-ioc/#sthash.LjhXn5Wn.dpuf

Comment TFA doesn't tell the whole truth (Score 2) 181

TFA doesn't tell the whole truth. You cannot get Gnome 2 Look and Feel with Gnome 3. You just cannot. You cannot have workplaces in a grid, you cannot move and place your applets way you want, you cannot even have sensible task bar - one that is from applets doesn't even have context menus on buttons to allow one to move application to different workplace. It's like you spend couple of days tuning Gnome 3 and still get 'something' that is very far from what you've already had in Gnome 2 for many years. But that's only for starters. Then one can remember that with Gnome 2 often comes compiz with lot's of features and lots of eye candy. And that all begs a question - what exactly the purpose of the Gnome rewrite? It seems like their main goal was to copy all bad features from macos. And it was would have been perfectly fine if they didn't so badly break Gnome 2 with all their library changes. It's like one of the most popular DEs just seized to exist overnight. You upgrade you Ubuntu/Fedora/etc and... your desktop is no more. And you were so much used to it. I'm not against innovation in any way... But would it be better to perform experiments in the labs, not in schools/factories? Ubuntu with their Unity is much better in that sense - they did not take your choice away. But Gnome 3 did - and that's main problem.

Comment Unanimous defeat of common sense (Score 2) 214

Isn't cDNA just same DNA but written a bit differently? That is, it contains same information. And it looks like this ruling allows one to patent that information! The very same information that is used to produce proteins in YOUR body. This ruling sounds like - we cannot allow you to patent your record in MP3 format, but if you transcode it to FLAC - go ahead and patent it. Doesn't make any sense.

Comment What exactly those copyright owners are planning.. (Score 1) 172

..to achieve in court? This is the thing I truly do not understand. So suppose they get names out of those IPs and the bring those poor people to court. What next? All they have is the list of IPs from one of those companies that were mentioned on /. recently. I.e companies that are heavily affiliated with copyright owner. Can this list of IP addresses be hold as any sort of evidence? I mean anybody can go to whois service, get block of IPs Tekksavvy is using and randomly choose N IPs from it. Then sell this as 'prof of copyright infringement'. So whoever is producing this list has clear financial incentive to make it long and there is no way he can prove that that list of IPs was gathered in any way that correlates with any sort of copyright infringement. Will court accept such 'evidence'? This sounds to me like allowing victim's family to find and bring in DNA of the killer - not the thing generally allowed.

Comment Re:The infection of GPL stunts growth... (Score 2) 946

Nvidia is creating Linux driver not because of good will, but because Linux gives Nvidia access to very fast growing market. And yes, Nvidia will notice if this market won't be accessible. Everybody else on that market will be just happy without Nvidia. In short: Nvidia needs good Linux driver more then Linux needs Nvidia at all.

Comment Re:GPL API (Score 1) 946

What sort of trade secrets? It's not sarcasm, I'm really curious. From what I know all 'innovations' that make them competitive should already be patented. What else can they put into driver that they are giving away for reverse engineering by competitors?

Comment Re:GPL API (Score 3, Informative) 946

Nvidia can go and reimplement (in a 'clean room') Linux kernel and it's APIs - nobody would have problems with that. But it seems like to much work for Nvidia. Instead it takes existing Linux environment, stuffs it with their blob and starts making money on selling chips for smartphones/tablets/etc. And it doesn't give anything back to the community. And that sounds like a violation of spirit of the GPL. And nobody asks Nvidia billions of dollars, nobody even asks Nvidia to give their chips for free. People just think it would be nice of Nvidia to open source its drivers. Drivers for products customers already payed for! It doesn't seems like to much to ask, does it?

Comment Seems like a good thing (Score 3, Interesting) 79

This surveillance will be mostly used to catch people downloading movies from torrent. No, it won't be used to catch people looking for child porn - media industry (which is owned by same people as telcos) is not interested in catching them, they are after 'pirates'. So, all 'pirates' go to jails (like half of the country), nobody subscribes to the internet anymore, telcos die, PROFIT. Also, this would probably kill movie industry as well because most of their clients that go to the cinema and pay real cash (i.e. youth) will be in jails. Piracy would be eliminated because there is nothing to pirate anymore. Isn't this great? The next reasonable move would be to make all those jailed 'pirates' work on uranium mines. This will solve Canadian carbon emission problems as well. Great future is coming, cannot wait!

Comment Buy DVD == Criminal? (Score 1) 587

Each time I watch a DVD I paid for they show be this black screen with words 'prison', 'illegal', 'fine'. I'll probably read though this text once or twice. After this - this screen will just affect my subconsciousness making very strong association from DVD I bought in Walmart with words 'prison', 'illegal', 'fine'. Result - I'll subconsciously feel guilty every time I watch a legally bought DVD and every time I even think about buying a DVD. Movie industry is putting great amount of effort to make their product subconsciously uncomfortable for people. The purpose of this move is a mystery.

Comment That's not content producer's business (Score 2) 250

I can install antenna on my roof and receive a signal. I can hire someone to install antenna on my roof. My neighbour can offer me to install my antenna on his roof (for money!) and pull wire to my house - because he has better reception. I can hire company X to install antenna on their roof and send signal to my house over wire. All this is not content producer's business! I can receive over-the-air signal in any way which is convenient to me. And I'm just hiring anyone I want to provide me with antenna.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry

Working...