Comment Re:Better than Intel (Score 1) 123
Depends on your cost metric. They're only cheaper if you don't consider cost per computation/second.
Depends on your cost metric. They're only cheaper if you don't consider cost per computation/second.
You don't have to use metro, you know. Click the little desktop tile when you first login, or use one of the metro bypassers like start8 (even puts the start button back). Not sure why anyone would miss the start button though. Something like Launchy for pre windows 7, or just start typing after hitting a button for windows 7 and on. I suppose if you're a non-keyboard user user, it almost makes sense.
>The problem is keeping the "car" stably in contact with the ground.
If the thrust is around 30,000 lbs, and you point only 1% of that the wrong way, you have to come up with 300lb of force to keep the car going straight, on a dirt road...better be quick, because you're going 1000mph!
Crazy!
I would love to see the track marks after the run. I'm guessing there's all sorts of sliding around.
I wonder what percent of power goes to downforce.
In the future I see a harmonized ui.
When you stick your device into the desktop dock, it's a desktop, using an external graphics accelerator, mass storage, network, mouse, etc. When you pull it off of the dock (that isn't bound by one manufacturer)....
.
.
But, *all of the software* is aware of the docking state. If you pull off the keyboard, the touchpad keyboard pops up when needed. The UI expands to be less "consumption" oriented use. When you attach it to the desktop, the UI changes and expands into more of a "developer mode" to accommodate a mouse and the extra horsepower built into the desktop dock.
Of course, this wont happen because it's not what people want...but it sure would be nice.
Here here good Sir! You're not suggesting that he had some sort of privileged access to the thread before anyone else!? That would require an inside man, and we all know that the Slashdot editing staff would never allow such a thing! Surely you jest!
They'll just implement a "random wobble" algorithm after the first is found.
How do they measure the distance of something like this?
If my screen cold fold back or rotate around, I would be all for this. Otherwise, no...your laptop ends up being across the table, and most computer desks are too short in these days of flat screens.
My last laptop screen had brackets that fit either way and it lived with the screen backwards just for this reason.
...but I definitely have a fear of consuming or inhaling anything nano-particle based. But, I also think it's insane that we have no long term medical studies...of anything really.
I'd agree, but this would have to be something to do with infrared, otherwise it wouldn't work in the evening. I have trouble believing much information would be present in an infrared-only illuminated hand, although, the numbers they quote could be best case (well lit room with wrinkle hands).
Speckle interferometry? Mid infrared laser with a piezo shift mirror and a decent resolution ccd?
In other news, in a Slashdot interview with Slashdot user "anonymous coward", "anonymous coward" claims to be the most powerful and intelligent user, in the world.
This is the original image. You're free to do as many lossy operations on it as your heart desires.
Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.