Comment Re:Not even much money (Score 1) 423
Are you attempting to argue
No.
I don't argue with libertards. I just insult them. I save my arguing for actual libertarians, not basement-dwelling teens on a Rand trip.
Are you attempting to argue
No.
I don't argue with libertards. I just insult them. I save my arguing for actual libertarians, not basement-dwelling teens on a Rand trip.
Your definition of progressive is broken.
Then again, you are obviously a libertard, so what else would I expect.
She was an integral part in shaping the disastrous foreign policy that led up to the war. In an interview before the inauguration (maybe even before the election itself) on CNN she was telling the interviewer that when in power she and the rest of the team would make an end to the 'Clinton multilateralism'.
In other words, she was pushing for the disastrous 'our way or the highway' policies of the Bush Administration since before she even got to the State Department.
Maybe it wouldn't be so underresourced if the developers weren't such arrogant jackasses. This and the Debian disaster a few years back show that OpenSSL is hopelessly broken at the social level and should be ditched by all parties.
The interesting bit to me is that the whole thrust of systemd seems to be to inject a Windows NT style Registry onto Linux.
Yeah, but that's because you're an idiot. Seriously? Cough up some good proof, and not just personal speculation.
If we adopt this policy, then the winning strategy is to constantly be an asshole to everyone,
I take it you haven't looked at Karmashock's posting history?
"Downing their tools" means "they walked out of the job". It's perfectly standard British English.
Just like he blamed 'One More Day' on Joe Quesada?
My question to JMS would be: how do you always get away when you produce crap and manage to make others take the fall?
Note to the JMS fanbois: yes, he does produce good stuff, but he slipped up plenty of times, and for some reason noone holds it against him but always blames Executive Meddling
It's a bullshit argument regardless. If there is enough elasticity in the price that costs can be passed on, then a rational actor would have raised prices already.
Really? So the depositors got their money back from government-backed insurance?
Fuck off back to La-La-land, please.
Shitheads like you is why far too many women put up with harassment for far too long.
Enjoy it while it lasts, because the tide is turning.
Not spouting bigotry is being polite. Some self-censorship is a good thing.
Wait, you're seriously arguing that the deregulation of the financial sector in the latter half of the 20th century was a good thing?
I give up, you're another libertard.
I am continuously amazed at the ability of Libertards and Bitfanbois (a large overlapping demographic) to be confronted with historical facts and then just assert 'nuh-uh, ain't so.'
Creating scarcity sounds like a baron homesteading a piece of land and telling the peasants that they now have to answer to him.
Once again the language used betrays the Internet Libertarians as neo-feudalists.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion