Per Wikipedia:

So after the special, he won two more elections as county executive.
As deep expressions of hatred for a group of people go, I can't think of any more subtle.

What if (IF!) there was an imbalance, and the people of the state felt as though Milwaukee were sucking them dry, and Walker was merely leveling the playing field? Same behavior pattern as, say, Washington D.C. draining the rest of the country, in the vampire fashion?
Could the Walker administration simply represent an outburst of. . .fairness (to drop the f-bomb)?

Capitalism says you're either the dog, or the fire hydrant. Economic seasons occur, much as autumn and winter. Why does Socialism H8 nature*?

*This is a deliberate troll that I think is funny as an example of the non-sequiturial broad jump.
It is submitted as a clinical example of the form for academic discussion, more than as an attempt at personally baiting you.
Any actual blood pressure increase, adrenaline rush, oral foaming, or angry keyboard pounding occurring as a result of this troll are wholly owned by the reader.
The author, Pontius Pilate style, washes his hands of all responsibility for any unintended consequences resulting from this troll.

The intent here is for the two of us, you (believer) and me (infidel), to go through your little Commie Qur'an word for word, so that you can help me achieve enlightenment.

Well, we seem to be in violent agreement here, but you appear to have a deeper commitment to talking about how I won't commit than to accomplishment of anything in particular. *golf clap*

I promise I will make a fully classical commitment to trying to find something of value in it.

I've said I will multiple times in this very thread.

How many more repetitions of commitment are required to communicate this to you? Remember: I'm here for YOU, man.

So, what is the Milwaukee reference metric which you feel he is required to meet to placate your ruffled feathers? Have you communicated this to him?

You win. The crystalline perfection of all public servants (except the conservative ones) is so unimpeachable that they're kind of like scientists whose lab is society itself.

No, really, it boils down to individuals vs. the collective.

How can a union, as such, possibly be an object of murder? All Walker did was enact some common-sense reforms, right?
Public sector unions are a mutiny awaiting their moment, or, in the case of Wisconsin, trying to have their way with taxpayers.
I hasten to add that I have no problem with private sector unions, insofar as there are right-to-work laws to keep them in check.

As a rhetorical matter, how under the sun would you even prove that?

No, no: are you willing to do an interactive read with me of this text? We can go back and forth in ~300 word chunks.
I'm willing to slog through the cess pool of Marx's thought. . .if you are.
I'm also willing to do the same with, say, the Gospel of Mark with you. It's the shortest. But let's do yours first.
Because I'm a giver like that.

Ah, PMF. I was trying to remember the name of that one account I had the run-ins with years ago. A lengthy discussion of whether a cancer is just a mutation that went awry comes to mind. Wouldn't shut up until I offered a link to a Biochemistry textbook, in fact. Putz.

I've had some far less pleasant run-ins.

Of course the lottery "can work". In pointing out S.P. as a potential officeholder from it, I kinda seem to have stipulated that it must work. (Duh?)
I'm discussing the kind of consequence you'd face, and pointing out an apparent contradiction: your support of the mechanism seems at odds with a potential result.

Your perceived inconsistency is what, exactly?

No, no: I want an actual plan of posting/critiquing pieces of it as JEs. Are you going to step up to the plate, or whine in the stands, Slugger?