Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Doesn't this give EFF standing to sue? (Score 1) 225

Previous court cases were thrown out because no one could prove they were being spied on. PERFECT ! Either: A) FBI can install equipment using by citing authorizations which gives ISPs and customers grounds to sue ...or... A) FBI cannot install equipment because they have cited no authorization to do so. SO which is it FBI? Are you, or are you not installing equipment? ** Fuck sports. GO TEAM EFF !!!! **

Comment Aaron Swartz did a routine thing, journals knew it (Score 2) 67

As an NLP Bioinformatics guy, I believe the real crime Aaron Swartz committed was being in the news.

He isn't the first to have that dataset and he wont be the last.
We write papers using massive NLP scans of publications rather routinely.

Most of the time, the papers are downloaded from PubMed (public funded) so they can't even complain about bandwidth costs, etc.

For anyone who didn't know already, most subscription Publishers don't **DO** anything.
They are only slightly better than patent trolls, and in some cases, worse.

Comment Re:What would they come back to? (Score 2) 260

After their comeback, they will ___________. Their focus is on ___________.

After their comeback, they will HIRE Time Berners Lee. Their focus is on the Semantic Web.

Why would the inventor of the WWW work for Yahoo?
Because you give him ALL the resources to make his dream a coherent reality.

Long shot for sure, but its what I would do.

Comment Re:It's only been 40 years since Nixon (Score 1) 248

The "Too Big To Jail" story is the greatest threat to democracy and world stability. If we come crashing down, it will be banks not terrorists. Honestly, I consider banks to be more hostile to me than terrorists. Truly -- I mean that. Terrorists bomb you when you spend a decade in their country installing puppets. Banks do it to their own neighbors for the thrill of success. That's much more hostile, IMHO.

Comment Re:easy answer FTFY (Score 1) 173

"Any scientist these days is going to have to be proficient with computers and analyzing data" IAMA phd bioinformatics person with a CS background and love for math. The biological problems are increasingly requiring graduate level math and computer science training, for example gene network analysis, biological structure and binding prediction, and bayesian analyses, to name a few. While the biology is obviously not simple, it can be more easily learned as "on the fly" (though this is still very difficult). Why? Because biology is more QUALITATIVE and computer science/math is more QUANTITATIVE. FWIW, 1 opinion + 1 more = 1.

Slashdot Top Deals

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...