I don't think popsicle sticks would be very pleasant. A good finger condom might go further toward convincing your partner that they were having a good time.

How about just a small sample bit of test material that is packaged with the condom?
As it stands you'd have to dip it in before you got the feedback. I'd prefer the feedback up front, I would think.

Ok, so I just want to clarify here. I have no feeling one way or the other about this activity.

They are saying that there is no KNOWN benefit to this practice and there COULD BE bad consequences.
So how is that different than saying that there COULD BE benefits but there are no KNOWN bad consequences?

Aren't they really just reporting "We don't know one way or the other"? Except, as usual, the reporting has a slant injected into it.

This is an engineering breakthrough. But we are still waiting on a medical breakthrough.

The real problem in diabetes is not limited to having the correct amount of insulin in the blood in real time. The problem that makes diabetes so hard to treat is that a person's cells develop insulin resistance, requiring larger and larger doses of insulin to break down sugars correctly.

I don't think theater does disprove that. A general rule can be a general rule even if you do find what appears to be an exception.

Besides, of all different ways to perform, theater has one of the highest degrees of "relate" in it.

This is all great satire. Except Amazon doesn't make profits.

The role of the POTUS is not to create budgets, only to approve or veto. Per the US Constitution, it is the responsibility of Congress to create and pass budgets.

This will go nowhere.

The POTUS approves or disapproves of budgets. Per the US Constitution, it is the responsibility of Congress to create and pass budgets.

This will go nowhere.

http://www.reuters.com/article... NSA ~ RSA

Where are my mod points? Insightful!

More and more, I am beginning to believe that we either make ourselves comfortable with the fact that all information of any kind WILL flow through these digital lines, or we oppress ourselves with biased rules and unfair restrictions on freedom of speech.

I think we can adapt our expectations to the new paradigm. But it will take a lot of time and testing of our pre-set inhibitions and impulse to hide to adapt our culture to the information age in such a way that it doesn't make us prisoners of rules.

It's their ability to get results that needs to change. Our attitudes will reflect what outcomes we observe, thank you very much.

So those people who care for that "someone's son", should live and die by their bad decisions to leave our guns. Not the rest of society.

Thank you for correcting our interest in space.

I'm sure all of humanity will never again wonder if they can travel through it.

There are satellites exploding up there!

Of course itzly, you know this has nothing to do with getting your job done better.

This issue is about style. One of the things that has a big impact on a human being's mood is being exposed to a new aesthetic. I will have plenty of time to sit around in the same stagnant environment for eternity when I'm dead.

For now, let's just embrace the fact that constant change is here to stay.