Go read this Journal and the comments therein:
Link
What's telling is that there is an AC - probably my friend damn_registrars, but let's say for argument's sake that it isn't.
Let's assume that the AC is truly a third party. If so, it completely blows Squeak's previous claims that "everyone" believed him that he has no sock puppets, as here is clearly an individual who agrees with me that he does indeed as sock puppets.
If the AC is not damn_registrars, it shows that the AC agrees with me, that damn_registrars has sock puppet accounts, since the AC believes that this account is one of them. Of course, the reality remains that damn_registrars has at least 6 known sock puppet accounts.
Yes, 6, I revised my sig to include damn_registrar's red4men sock puppet account that he created when he was getting trolled by the late Red.
Now, let's consider the other option - that the AC troll is simply damn_registrars trying to discredit this account. Certainly, that would be a logical assumption as it fits his previous pattern of behavior of obsession and harassment, a pattern that is well documented already.
It is perhaps noteworthy that damn_registrars, despite reading Captain Splendid's journal, has not attacked the AC for insinuating that I am one of his sock puppets the way he attacked me for pointing out the sock puppet. Therefore, it is logical to infer that either he finally concedes and admits that he is a sock puppeteer - based on not going completely apeshit like he did in my journal, or is behind the current AC troll trying to discredit this account.
So which is it?
Is it both?
There isn't a scenario where I lose here. Victory is mine.