I'm not sure that I hear a success story there. Has it actually contributed to your career significantly, or are you just enjoying being able to speak/read the language? In the U.S., there are so many Chinese-Americans who can speak much more fluently than someone who learned it as a second language and/or Chinese immigrants who would basically be willing to sacrifice a limb for a green card that it's not a particular competitive advantage in the workplace. In China, there is such discrimination against foreigners in hiring and promotion that trying to get a real job is an exercise in futility. It doesn't sound like you've been able to actually do more than gain some social value from your experience with Chinese.

As someone who has learned Chinese as an adult, I would recommend against it unless you have the opportunity to do so without sacrificing considerable opportunity costs or have the luxury of not having to worry about opportunity costs. The learning process is considerably more time-consuming and challenging than a European language, and you cannot learn it to a functional level from taking classes. (There are many foreigners I've met in China who took four years of Chinese as an undergraduate and were astonished to discover when they set foot in the country that they were totally non-functional.) You have to actually live in a Chinese-speaking country, and it's very hard to get a decent job in China unless you're moved there by a multinational and retain your salary and benefits from the home country. Even then, if you're working a regular job, you simply won't have time to learn the language in a reaonable tme frame. I know plenty of expats in China who have been working here for 7-10 years and still can barely ask for directions in Chinese.

Finally, if you think you can simply show up in China and people will be beating down your door to give you a great job, think again. The idea that China is full of potential is a total myth for Westerners. There are almost no opportunities for Westerners outside of teaching English or other jobs unrelated to professional technical positions, and no Chinese-owned firm I've heard of has ever given a Westerner a management position with any authority. Whereas in the United States, being a non-U.S. citizen does not impose a glass ceiling, in China quite the opposite is true. You simply won't make money here unless you are working for a multinational and are moved here from your home country rather than someone who moves here and is then hired in-country, in which case your living here is taken as a clear signal you're willing to work for local wages.

In short, people who talk about Chinese as a way to open doors and create opportunities are simply out of touch with the realities on the ground in China.

If the firm uses CentOS today because they find that optimal, they may find paying for Red Hat support tomorrow optimal. If they use some other operating system, they will be less likely to ever send Red Hat money. So take this opportunity to educate the CIO so that if your firm is ever in the position of needing their services, he or she will know where to go.

The goal should not be to eliminate free riders. In fact, free riding is an inherent component of the open source model and many who are free riders today will become paying customers tomorrow. The economic model works when the number of free riders is not so high that it chokes off resources necessary to develop the platform.

Whether or not that is the case for Red Hat is going to have little to do with your firm's decision or people's sentiments about whether paying for open source software is the right or wrong thing to do, and much to do with the general incentives that their economic model produces. Red Hat knows there are firms like yours wrestling with the same decision, and that many of them will chose options such as CentOS, but hopes that there are a sufficient number for whom it is a good business decision to avail themselves of Red Hat's (and other open source contributors') services that the product will command sufficient resources to continue to improve.