The report demonstrates that if you were to take into account mining, pollution, and adverse health impacts of coal and gas, wind power would be the cheapest source of energy, period.
Just how do you do the emphasized part? Are we supposed to trust someone to make an honest, unbiased, and also correct estimate of those costs?
The right "to be forgotten" does not exist — you have no right to affect the contents of other people's brains, notebooks, and databases.
Sure, Google is a "KKKorporation", but you have no more right to demand, they forget about you, than you can you force your ex to forget the good times you've once had together. And, yes, wiping out individual's memories — selectively — is already possible.
the prohibition on using the same dish for meat and dairy
The point was, there is no such prohibition.
The only thing the scripture actually proscribes is what I quoted: "cooking lamb in the milk of its mother". That's all — all other rules are derived from that. That they have been expanded to cover all dairy and all meat — even those derived from different species — is the phenomenon I used as an illustration.
What part of "well fucking regulated" don't you understand?
Which part of "petitioning the government for redress of grievances" don't you understand, citizen?
By your own logic, you don't have a right to any other speech — not to advertise anything, not to produce pornography, not to organize boycotts. Not even political campaign speeches are a right under your reading of the Bill of Rights — unless they are addressed to the sitting government as a form of a petition. If, of course, your thinking is self-consistent, and you are reading the First Amendment with the same literal strictness you are applying to the Second.
And by the logic of others of your kind, your Constitutionally-protected speech is limited to the means available in the 18th century too — even if you are merely petitioning the government, you don't have a right to do that via the Internet, TV, or radio.
Wow, I don't often explicitly admit to being sarcastic, but this particular post had attracted so much sincere hate from both responders and moderators, that I had to come clean... I would've thought, the term "KKKorporation" was a give-away, but no...
But then, of course, I have no proof, all of the hatred observed is really sincere either. Oh, well...
Ah, but it is spread through casual contact. Someone cough near you? Droplets are evil little creatures. Handshake with someone who coughed on their hands?
If you've not had the flu ever in your life, then you can feel safe. Ebola spreads at least as easily as the flu, likely much easier.
What I really worry about is the non-human vectors. Imagine one dog (1) in the park, finding the vomit of an infected human (2), and this becoming a new, very hard to track infection source. "Our family isn't feeling so good - can you watch Fido while we go to the doctor?" Repeat.
(1) - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm...
(2) - http://www.nbcnews.com/storyli...
About 2 hours
FTFWIKI
... Philippides, the one who acted as courier, is said to have used it first in our sense when he brought the news of victory from Marathon and addressed the magistrates in session when they were anxious how the battle had ended ; "Joy to you, we've won" he said, and there and then he died, breathing his last breath with the words "Joy to you". – Lucian translated by K.Kilburn.
so since it killed him, naturally, the first thing we do is try the same thing!
no wonder marathoners look like cancer survivors...
A really fast guy is Usain Bolt. For a marathon you need someone who can keep up a medium speed for 2 hours.
" Especially if there are three carriages full of people - getting them off safely cannot be the domain of one man."
I would suggest that one man has a better chance of doing than zero men. Unless you think the passengers should be left to fend for themselves until help can reach them?
Why?
2 main reasons:
- On the really old lines there is only about 6 inches between the train and the tunnel wall , there is NO escape walkway. So in an emergency a member of staff WILL be needed to evacuate passengers from the front or rear of the train and walk them along the track.
- When the tube gets really busy its virtually impossible for anyone to walk the length of the train inside so any staff might as well be in front driving it , or at least monitoring it in a cab.
Like they haven't been warned by the Clinton Administration demanding the even worse kind of backdoor — they have...
Nobody except moronic, hyper-partisan fuckwads (on "both[1]" "sides[2]") ever argued that the First and Second Amendments were mutually-exclusive, you know!
Personally, even the few hyperpartisan fuckwards I know have never stated anything of the kind. Strawman much?
The problem, that leads many people to contrast the First and the Second Amendments, is not that they contradict each other — no one thinks so — but that we are reading them differently.
The First Amendment is read as liberally and all-encompassing, as the Jews read the prohibition to "cook lamb in the milk of its mother" — combining goat cheese with beef is Treif even though neither are sheep, and a goat can not possibly be the bull's mother. Read like this, the Amendment's right to "petition the government for redress of grievances" is understood as the right to any and all speech — including even production of pornography.
If instead we read the First Amendment the way we are told to interpret the Second, however, only the speech addressed to the government — and only for a redress of grievances — would be a right. Oh, and you'd have to go through a wait-period before opening your mouth. And you'll need a license to exercise that right too.
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.
