Comment Re:Tech Support (Score 4, Informative) 356
How can a country that hosts so many of the world's call centers still have no idea how the internet works?
Well, if their understanding of Microsoft Windows support is any guide
How can a country that hosts so many of the world's call centers still have no idea how the internet works?
Well, if their understanding of Microsoft Windows support is any guide
Do you feel the same way about the 1st Amendment and modern technology?
Rights are Rights. You can argue about whether a certain expression of those Rights is "good" or "bad". But they're still Rights.
Don't confuse them with business decisions/rulings.
You have the Part 15 and ISM services for that. You really can buy a microwave link that's metropolitan-distance and legal to use.
We lost much of our 440 capability to PAVE PAWS in California. Remember, Amateur Radio is not the primary service on many bands. The military is on 440.
If you want that nearly infinite microwave spectrum, you have the Part 15 and ISM services. Absolutely nothing is stopping you. Power is not the issue with those frequencies, it's line of sight and Fresnel zones.
No, I absolutely do not have to prefix my words with anything. You do that by posting as an anonymous coward. I use my real name to indicate that I stand behind my words.
Yes. The usual mechanism here would be WiFi security, with HTTPS or SSL inside of it.
No,
It's never too late for a company the size and quality of msft to break into the phone market
I guess I have less faith. The XBox (360 that is) is the last thing MS that I can remember breaking into a market...and that was largely in spite of themselves (as proven so far by the One). I just don't see MS as an innovator. Maybe new leadership will change this.
It's also impossible for a software platform vendor to ignore mobile
Doesn't mean they are very good at it, or go about it very intelligently. Anyone can say "Hey we should get into this market". Its the execution that matters.
Zune, on the other hand, was bound to be eclipsed by more inclusive devices (think about the long dead ipod).
Again: Execution. Apple saw this, and basically took its existing iphone and ripped out the wireless radio. Bam, there's your iPod and at negligible manufacturing and R&D cost. MS on the other hand developed Zune and Phone completely separately. Not only is this a massive waste, it is a huge reflection of MS's silo'd corporate culture in general.
Finally, I can't think of one competitive advantage Apple or Google has that would constitute a moat protecting their current lock on the market
I think prior purchases (apps, vids, music, hardware) and apples vertical integration of their products are a couple significant obstacles. You have to come up with something special for users to ditch all of these ancillary purchases that "just work" and start fresh on a new platform. Maybe a more innovative and agile company can acheive this, but I don't think MS has it in them
It's just not the immediate end of the world as they may view it, but is being more sensitive to such things being crazy?
Their claims are what identify them as crazy.
From the summary:
Today, Lumsdaine views the thread connecting GPS and drones as part of a longer-term movement by military powers toward automated systems and compared today's conditions to the opening sequence of Terminator 2, where Sarah Connor laments that the survivors of Skynet's nuclear apocalypse "lived only to face a new nightmare: the war against the machines."
When they start comparing reality to sci-fi apocalypse movies then there is a problem.
And when they start destroying things because of it, they've gone into "crazy" territory.
Learned to really concentrate while serving on a submarine in the USN - to the "music" of fans and humming power supplies... so, for heavy brainwork at the computer all I need is the noise of the computer. Music just pulls me out of what I'm doing.
Oddly enough, the opposite is true when I'm working out in my woodshop, there I like to have music.
I've been clicking around to find a sample, and, maybe it's just me, but I didn't find any.
It's just you, and whoever modded you up - the second link in TFA takes your right to a sample.
(Don't bother though, it's lame.)
Are you talking about France? Or Russia? Or where then?
You sure as heck aren't talking about the US. The military (read Naval) reactor program parted ways with the civilian world decades ago - they're simply too dissimilar. Nor can civilian reactors effectively make plutonium, nor were they needed to. And the for companies involved in military reactors, government contracting is only one small corner of their business. Etc... etc...
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?