Since a /64 is the default allocation, that's more like an entire internet squared worth of it.

You know what NAT defeats? End-to-end connectivity.

That doesn't need "no power"; it harvests the energy from the signal itself. A similar thing could be imagined with digital equipment, although admittedly just a razor blade and a pencil doesn't get you very far in that situation.

Anyway, the detector radio, while interesting, cannot pickup FM, so I don't see how it is relevant here.

What comment are you referring to?

On the first glance, I don't see why that should be the case.

It does not

Both analog and digital radio need power. Neither uses the Internet as carrier.

A solar panel the size of a CCD sensor would probably suck. This way, at least it has a lens in front of it :-)

Power over Ethernet also requires a Power over Ethernet infrastructure.

They're doing whatever they perceive to be most profitable. If they are assuming closed source is the way to go, then closed source it is. Who gets to decide that, ultimately? The shareholders. What are the shareholders' objectives? Hint: It starts with R and ends in OI

yes. 32-valve, too.

Way to miss the point.

Besides, 'assembler' is a part of the toolchain. The language(s) are called 'assembly'.

You're not "embracing technology", you're embracing a goddamn consumer product. Geez.

Look at the pertinent CVEs related to (in particular) adobe flash, java, the usual suspects. I'm not doing your homework for you.

So you have never noticed malware being installed without you noticing, uh-huh. That's the kind of circular reasoning I'd expect self-proclaimed "power users", running Windows no less, to engage in, indeed.
Also, you don't understand seem to understand the pertinent attack vectors for shit.

No, I have seen some utterly substandard garbage code written by Ameriancs, so according to my anecdote it's probably from there.