Submission + - Linux boycott called for (boycottlinux.org)
Disclaimer: We are not Unix purists by any means. We do recognize the need for a new Unix kernel in the 21st century, but Linux is not it.
or huge battery life...
isn't going to happen with the raspi.
No, not with Model A+, either.
Except that it's really not that dynamic.
Except that it really is that dynamic. Who speaks DHCP with their ISP anyway. Protip: Often is IPCP on a PPP link.
Of course, silly claims like this
n/c
The linux kernel [is] in your desktops, in your web servers, in your cell phones
Not quite, but yeah. Is somewhat prevalent.
your cars, in your televisions, in your game systems, in your embedded devices...
Now your fanboyism is showing. None of those are significantly Linux-driven, which is mostly because of the GPL.
Stop giving Linux credit for what is primarly BSD domain, if anything.
Most BSD are hiding a lot from their user base.
What, are you missing BSD "expert bloggers" and stuff?
Hint: what you're saying is complete nonsense. Their documentation encourages, in numerous places, users to subscribe to their respective mailing lists.
Umm... you need to learn how warrants work.
Does he need to learn how warrants work?
Or do you need to be reminded of the status quo?
*adjusts tinfoil hat*
And that compatibility still is important today. For one thing, APIs can be written in C (starting with the POSIX API) and be used by programs written in either C or C++ or in language X, or language Y, or language Z.
FTFY. This is due to calling conventions, not due to a 'language compatibility'
Here's an idea: if you don't know shit about C++, don't post shit about C++?
Here's an idea: If you don't know shit about the basics of programming, don't post, like, at all. Especially avoid calling others idiots when you're at the same time making clear you're even less competent.
The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.