Comment Re:Strongly typed language? (Score 1) 299
Unfortunately I don't have a link handy that will help me use English correctly.
Unfortunately I don't have a link handy that will help me use English correctly.
Here is a great resource on these issues and might help you use some of the language you are using correctly:
http://www.pphsg.org/cdsmith/types.html
I understand that static versus dynamic is a fairly binary valued property, but my understanding is that strength of type systems is real valued.
There are 2 axes to strength:
1. If you have a type system (you outlaw certain programs), how well is it enforced? Are there ways to get around it? (Yes/No)
2. How many and what type of behaviors do you outlaw in programs. On this axis a lot of trade offs can be made. Do you allow automatic coercion? Do you allow generic data types to be expressed? If so, are covariant and contravariant type parameters allowed? etc... (Subjective 0.0 - 1.0)
Shouldn't the headline have a question mark at the end?
The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin