Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Simple (Score 1) 530

A better solution would be for ISPs to start fulfilling their promises rather than using savings to beef up executive compensation.

Part of the problem here is a conflict of understanding. When ISPs began offering "unlimited" Internet access, they were referring to time, not bandwidth. At the time, the limits on connection speed and number of total users meant that people were not going to use enough bandwidth to strain the system. Of course, the fact that ISPs oversold their capacity gives the people complaining (incorrectly) about it not being "unlimited the way they said it would be", a legitimate gripe that the ISPs are advertising a product that they cannot deliver. The ISPs banked on a certain usage level, but marketed the possibility of a greater usage level than that and now find their networks overwhelmed by the early adopters who understood the possibilities sooner. The ISPs created the situation and have just realized that their pricing model will not support the network expansion that will be necessary to meet the demand for bandwidth that will come as the average person starts to understand the possibilities that the early adopters are paving the way for.

Well, if that's the case, why didn't they drop "unlimited" when it wasn't about time anymore? Now, they specifically say Unlimited Data in some ads. THIS is what is misleading everyone and, rightfully, causing complaints. If they truly didn't want to confuse people, they would say "Unlimited Time, XXXGB Cap." Problem solved. This will never happen though, because their goal is to mislead customers.

Comment Re:What a concept! (Score 0) 152

This is an American hosted website, where my guess* would be the majority of users would be American. So yes, you should fully expect that things will be related to Americans by the users posting here. * Before I get blasted for making an assumption, I did look via Google and found no info about the distribution of the users by country.

Comment Re:Looking for trouble (Score 0) 205

Well, considering I had no income at that time, and knew the account should have only had $6 left in it and wouldn't use it, why would I keep logging in to check it? And yes I paid it, after the 45 days it would go to collections which would severely hurt my credit. The $60k in college loans is already dragging me down, I don't need something else to.

Comment Re:Why are you talking about Apple? (Score 0) 146

May I suggest eBay? After one search, I found tons of copies of both Leopard and Panther, for less than $30. The average price is around $20, so it seems it would be even cheaper. $20+$30 for both full retail discs to get you current is a lot better than $150-$200 for a Windows upgrade, though I have to admit their retail upgrade/full OS prices have come a lot down.

Comment Re:Damnit America (Score 0) 340

While I do not agree with this crap, and it's basically terrorism in my books, minus the "violence" aspect of it. Though I guess you could argue that putting someone who committed this "crime" with violent murderers and rapists will ultimately result in violence against that person. Anyways, getting that out of the way, this IS in fact dealing with our problems. The U.S. is going down the drains. Everything used to say "Made in U.S.A." on it, now it's all "Made in ." Music/Movies/TV/etc are now are major exports. They are simply protecting profits from those exports. Do I, as an American, agree? Hell, no. Can I somewhat understand the logic behind this? Yes, I can.

Comment Re:Why are you talking about Apple? (Score 1) 146

The way Apple does updates is a non-issue for most Mac users and makes sense to drop support for older versions.

A.) It keeps most people on a similar OS version, making it easier for Apple and I'd suspect most developers appreciate this as well. It's no fun trying to support a million different OS configurations, which is the case with Windows.
B.) They still support even the oldest Intel Macs with the latest OS, no one is being left out. This again allows everyone to be on a similar OS, making it easier for them.
C.) Unlike Windows where upgrading costs hundreds, even for a laptop that may have only cost $400, an OS X full system upgrade is only $30. If you paid $1,500-$5,000 for a system, $30 shouldn't be making you cringe, and personally, the features added are well worth the $30.
D.) It minimizes the amount of users who, for one reason or another, choose to stick with an OS that is over ten years old. Again, this is an issue for developers, who have to support all these configurations or lose out on a good portion of potential sales.

IMO, Apple is doing things the right way, and if I were in charge of a tech company that produced one of the major consumer operating systems, I would much rather go the route they chose, than the route Microsoft chose. All of these reasons apply to OS X as well as iOS.

Comment Re:Why guns? (Score 0) 229

There is recourse, depending how you go about it. For example, say you want to carry at work. You don't own that property, so don't assume you just can because you have a permit. Contact the owner of the company (or your branch, etc). Ask them if it is OK to carry, they should be able to give you a response without an issue. If no, that's their right as the property owner, if they say yes, get it in writing. If you're ever fired, and can prove it's related to this, you have the option to take them to court, and can definitely win. How do I know? My uncle had this happen to him and successfully won a suit against them, the judge even lectured the company owner about how wrong and ignorant this was, in more appropriate words.

The other problem, most gun owners have this issue where they need to blab about their guns to everyone they know. Don't, it's plain stupid, especially if you don't know that person's stance on gun control. You don't need to brag to everyone about the guns you have. I, for example, have a good size gun collection. How many people know? Outside of family, 5 or so. They're the people I'd trust with my life anyways, and typically go shooting with me weekly. Just use your brain, brag about your "big tv," not your big gun collection.

Comment Re:Govt.? (Score 0) 90

The real question is, why only third party companies? This bill should be worded to require consent to share the data with anyone, including whoever produced the device. There is no reason they need this data and it is an intrusion into the privacy of the individuals who were dumb enough to purchase a product from them.

Comment Re:Looking for trouble (Score 1) 205

$100, you got off lucky. I had $80 in my checking account, and bought something that was $70.68. Yes, I remember this amount exactly, I'll never forget it. PayPal double charged me, charging the debit card associated with that account, and the actual bank account. So, I overdrafted. The bank charged a $35 fee, but didn't pay the charge, which is standard practice there. So, PayPal, without ever notifying me, and the bank never notified me for over a month, tried to process this charge EVERY DAY for 38 days, at which point I only found out because my monthly statement was in the mail. Yup, a $70.68 purchase that I had the money to cover in the first place, ended up costing me $1,471.36. Yes, that is $1,471.36. Now, my local bank had zero sympathy, and despite the fact they should have notified me about this, wouldn't reduce the fees one cent, and required me to pay it off within 45 days. Being a broke college student who doesn't have a job while in school, I was screwed. Of course, they were happy to give me a loan for $1,515.50 (3% processing fee.) So now, for a damn text book for school, I paid $1,515.50, which will be even more after you account for interest. Lessons learned? NEVER use a local credit union, they're useless idiots. I closed my PayPal account and will never use them again. I also had every bank do a complete block on PayPal, who knows if there will be some mysterious "ghost" charge from my closed PayPal account, I wouldn't be surprised. So while I have sympathy for your $100-$10 purchase, it could be much, much worse.

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...