Submission Summary: 0 pending, 119 declined, 38 accepted (157 total, 24.20% accepted)
In a healthy project we would expect to see a large number of volunteer developers involved, in addition — we would expect to see a large number of peer companies contributing to the common code pool; we do not see this in OpenOffice.org. Indeed, quite the opposite we appear to have the lowest number of active developers on OO.o since records began: 24, this contrasts negatively with Linux's recent low of 160+. Even spun in the most positive way, OO.o is at best stagnating from a development perspective.
What does this say about the open source movement if only 24 developers are working on Microsoft Office's free alternative?
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.