They're not saying that nuclear power has the only impact. Just that since 1945, our overall environmental impact has increased dramatically- with China building 800 GW of coal plants being a perfect example. While our per capita impact in many ways has decreased, the huge increase in population has caused the aggregate impact to increase greatly.

Also, while Japan and France may be scaling back their nuclear power generation, the "anti-nuclear" Obama administration has given the final approval for 4 new reactors. They're the first new ones since the 70s.

The price of silver fell 25% in the second half of last year. That's not a "collapse", but it's still pretty bad.

I used to feel that way. Then I packed up my shit and moved out of Indiana. Best decision I ever made.

The people who didn't vote are just as responsible as the people who voted for a Republican Senator.

If you think "they're all the same anyway", then fine. Just don't complain when Ted Cruz is a committee chair.

This is the correct answer.

The American people, collectively, chose the Republican Party to be in charge of the Senate. This is the result.

Yes, I know.

The point is that John Boehner has had to approve of all legislation since January 2011. That completely destroys the "insightful" comment made by the parent post.

Democrats lost control of Congress in 2010. It was in all the papers.

Emails have time stamps.

That's unfortunate that you bought a crappy car. My voice recognition works great.

"The broken English looks deliberately bad and doesn't exhibit any of the classic comprehension mistakes you actually expect to see in "Konglish". i.e it reads to me like an English speaker pretending to be bad at writing English."

That's your "proof that NK couldn't possibly have hacked Sony"?

Seriously?

Citation, please.

An official statement from the FBI isn't exactly the same as some anonymous blog.

You can doubt the FBI all you want, but I don't know of anyone else having access to the primary evidence involved.

And as the other reply alluded to, what would be the motive for anyone else besides North Korea? It would have to be a very psycho ex-employee to risk going to jail for the rest of their lives for no personal gain. The threat to bomb theaters showing the film doesn't fit the disgruntled employee theory at all.

So you heard something on the internet, and that's automatically factually correct?

Who are you talking to? Mr. Strawman?

The US is currently building 4 nuclear reactors. "Anti-Nuclear" Obama appointed a bunch of "anti-nuclear activists" to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. They have approved 4 reactor construction applications. For those keeping score, that would be 4 more approved applications than Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush's RCS did combined over the previous 28 years.

At the same time, France and Japan are shutting down reactors. One of the new French President's campaign promises was to scale back France's use of nuclear power.