Comment Re:WHO forced them? (Score 1) 141
Well, aside from the fact that nuclear war would be bad for the health of everyone in the world.
Well, aside from the fact that nuclear war would be bad for the health of everyone in the world.
In my case, a stopped brain is.. what were we talking about again?
Entrapment has never been legal in the USA.
This does not stop them from doing it every single day.
A lot of it is due to the Dunning-Kruger effect. The cops know you did it, because they arrested you. They wouldn't have arrested you if they were not sure you were guilty. They know they never make mistakes. And then they stop investigating the crime once they have someone to pin it on.
Reminds me of this scene.
Is a gullible idiot.
Yes they are, and our justice system should take that into account. Confessions should not be admissible as evidence in court unless the jurors are given a full, uncut tape of the interrogation that led up to that confession.
Oh theydo take it into account. By using this to trump up charges and get confessions for people that may be innocent, and generally abuse the justice system.
Everything you said is hilarious.
Offensive or just in disagreement?
Can religious people just disagree without being offended to the point of violence?
It bears remembering that Pope Francis is speaking in a moral fashion not a legal one.
My moral compass tells me that free speech trumps the Pope's or the followers of Islam's feelings of being insulted by it.
Just because we have the legal right to offer deadly insults doesn't mean we should exercisce that right.
Charlie Hebdo did not threaten to kill anyone. Even if they did, it does not justify murdering anyone.
There is a giant gap between "punch" and "murder". Yes, both are wrong, but one of them is much worse. People treating them as the same are either apologizing for what happened, or willfully ignorant.
It sounds more like the Pope will have one of his millions of followers punch the guy.
That was a smart idea. But I will not take the extra step and say you are a smart person...
Well if they went in and punched the workers at Charlie Hebdo instead of murdering them, you might have a point.
Instead, you are just an apologist.
I was not aware that holocaust denial was punishable by death.
Also, I would only say illegal things if I agreed with them. The holocaust actually happened.
And even if you want to deny it, I am not going to murder you over it. Sure, free speech has consequence; but murder is not a valid consequence, no matter what the person said.
So, what you are saying is: If someone says something you don't like; it is ok to kill them.
Got it... and fuck you too.
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
