Market invisible hand fails here, it seems better suited at destroying value than creating it.

And we even know why: market invisible hand theory relies on a few assumptions, one of them being that products are identical and that buyers' choices are only driven by price. Once we say that "book prices don't seem to be the deciding factor on whether someone reads a book", we know it will not work. If producing books is considered important, then the market should be regulated.

The ECB created 1 trillion euros within 2 months to save the banks, while 30 trillions euros existed. Tthis is a 1/30 increase, this is rather huge.

I agree with you about inflation, but we are very far from the point where USD or EUR are dumped for other currencies. We live the opposite excess, in fact.

Not always. Central banks created huge amount of money to save banks after the subprime crisis, and it did not hurt the currencies. Economists tells us the increase of currency will not hurt when used during a depression, because it will not fuel prices increases.

Elite scientists? In that 1% group we will find heads of labs that sign the papers of any of their underlying. They also file patents and have stocks in statups. This kind of "elite" is the parasite kind.

Now I find no way to find in publication data who are the really exceptional scientists. We would have to look at paper quality to tell that.

TFA says

Or they will struggle to survive by working in jobs the intelligent machine do not want to do