The difference between your example of a corporation and a nation is that the corporation has limited liability. The janitor of that corporation will lose his job, but he will not be held financially accountable for the bad decisions the CEO made. Not so for the Greeks. Their governments and elites had a ball, and the population is now forced to foot the bill.
The fact of the matter was that Greece has lost 25% of their GDP in the last 6 years, largely due to austerity measures, but were able to create a balanced budget in 2014, and were on the way to have a surplus in 2015. So no, they were no longer living beyond their means. The debt is however crippling at 180% of their GDP (from 135% in 2009, see what a declining GDP can do?).
Totally agree. However, back in the day when Greece was allowed in the EURO (not EU), their obvious unsuitability was waived by France and Germany (under loud protest from the Netherlands and the Finns). It's appalling to see the German politicians ride the moral high-ground after:
1. Allowing the Greeks in the euro in 2001 in the first place when it was obviously a bad fit (same holds for Italy)
2. Breaking the stability pact in 2003 when it was convenient for them, opening the floodgates
3. Profiting immensely from the increased export that was fueled by ill-advised loans to a corrupt elite in the Southern nations
4. Bailing out the banks wrt Greece and offloading the Greek debt on the European population at large
5. Pointing the German anger at a foreign nation to hide their shenanigans
From my point of view it's a very sinister game that's being played here and the European project has failed. The Germans in particular seem to be incapable of taking responsibility for their actions and have stooped to a very dangerous form of demagogy. Let's stop this farce.
If we truly want to increase the carrying capacity of the earth, we should also stop eating plants directly, and just eat some mass-produced gooey that will keep us alive. If we do that, we might be able to sustain a population of a few hundred billion.
In other words, food will always be scarce if the population grows in response to a surplus. Malthusian. Not eating meat is not even the beginning of a solution. Controlling population growth is.
The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent
- John Maynard Keynes
I.e., yes, you can make a lot of money of it, but it requires a lot of patience and money to be able to do so. The Japanese market was overvalued for about 20 years until the bubble finally burst in the nineties. The current China crisis can go either way -- full bust or a regain of control for another decade. There are only a few people with enough money and patience to profit from this by consistently buying puts that are way out of the money and losing money on them year after year -- waiting for that one moment when they make a fortune. Taleb is one.
Why would one want to divert attention to something so utterly insignificant?
Simply because these banks are cooperative banks that are typically run by politicians. Making them go bankrupt would make a lot of Germans much poorer, and their anger would be directed toward management of those banks: German (ex-) politicians. We can't have the bubble burst that German politicians know best how to run a financially austere society.
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!