... in fact, never mind the Internet and blackjack!

Arguably, most research can have military application. If we start asking all such projects to self sensor themselves, the scientific process gets cut off at the knees. The dividing line between civilian and military applications is vacuous at best (think Internet).

Here here! Who needs silly things like the Internet anyway.

Using the photos as a basis for further investigation is tenable, relying on the photos as the only evidence is jumping to conclusions. I never said it was the wrong conclusion, but it is effectively making a choice with little and incomplete information. Much like we don't know what she told Manulife about her illness, Manulife also don't know the circumstances surrounding the reason she was at the beach. There are many beaches in Quebec, for all we know, this could have been in her back yard on one of her good days.

I think this phrase effectively summarizes the problem with this approach: are banks going to refuse to offer service to someone who doesn't have a Facebook account? If not, then cancel your account before applying to a loan or lie; thus rendering the practice useless. However, if the banks do refuse service to people without social media accounts (completely, not selected services as mentioned in TFA), we'll have effectively created a world where if you don't exist in Google, you don't exist.

From TFA:

There's no mention of any further investigation, but this sounds like jumping to conclusions to me.

Perhaps the collapse of the society began before it became matriarchal. The patriarchs might have just fouled up the whole system and given up. The fact that societies collapsed shortly after becoming matriarchal does not mean the two are causally related. There is not sufficient evidence to do more than hypothesize about it.

Something tells me that Viacom has enough money to prolong any legal battle until such a time when FedFlix is no longer solvent and has to give up the fight regardless of whether they are right or wrong.

Your mileage may vary depending on whether your talking about choking an avian or that other euphemism thing. I'm pretty sure KFC is not squeamish when it comes to dead chickens.

How long until we have a CellOS back-end for GCC?

Charging $99 for this service might seem less problematic if it wasn't the only channel by which you could distribute apps. Not to say that it's not a valid model, but it surprises me that hard core capitalists aren't ripping on this as a circumvention of the mechanisms that make the free market work. Having to pay the $99 dollars to distribute the app is not the problem. Being required to do so is.

Of course using wood extensively as a construction material as a way of doing carbon sequestration has a big risk factor associated with it (See the Great Fire of Chicago). Seems to me it would be less risky to periodically cut down the fast growth lumber and send it into the sun. Then again, that sounds slightly James Bond supervillain insane (I say this while petting a white cat).

Wouldn't that mean that when Apple acquires NASA, it will be changed to iAsteroid and iMoon?

The evidence showed up 40 years ago as a result of this experiment. Because the neutrinos went faster than the speed of light, they traveled back in time and were observed in 1970. Incidentally, right around the time of the beginning of the Unix epoch.

It might be considered cooking if the algorithm is found to process results relating to a particular party differently than those relating to every other party. A search algorithm should be mostly input agnostic, however, suppressing SPAM, for example, is a legitimate reason not to be. The line between tuning and willful introduction of bias, or flat out censorship, can be quite blurry. My head hurts just thinking about it.

...and who says punctuation is not important?