Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Nuclear is obvious, an energy surplus is desire (Score 2) 433

>> True, nuclear waste is not pollution unless it escapes in an accident

Bullshit.
Nuclear waste will escape. why ? because it has billion years of time, will structurally degrade, and there is no known material to contain it.
It already escapes after a few years in every storage man has built for it.
During it's lifetime, it will inevitably mix with soil on a large scale., with all the consequences.

Comment On the long run (Score 1, Interesting) 148

>> A few dozen people might wind up with cancer someday because Japan uses nuclear power.

Nope. The first years it was close to 600 in the direct vincinity:
https://nuclearhistory.wordpre...

The number is not considering the widespread ingestion of contaminated agricultural produce, and is exponential over the years (or at least over the firt 300 years)

On the long run, Fukushima takes more lives than the tsunami. Much more.

Comment Re: I have a plan (Score 1) 167

>> A shuttle can lift 30ton into LEO.
Yep. Somehow, LEO does not sound like a good idea. All things you send to LEO come back to earth within years

>> you can easily launch all three remaining shuttles with one reactor each
That is a really bad idea. The US space shuttle is not a model of reliability.
as soon as this happens:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
with one ton of Pu onboard, we are all dead.

Comment Re:You're asking for unobtanium (Score 1) 167

>> First of all, any wall or barrier can be breached

You are totally right !
And there is another point to it : radioactive waste is releasing various (radioactive, and explosive) gasesover time. You cannot hold these gases forever, so you have to vent them into the athmosphere >> a barrier is not only imposible, but it's also not desirable over the long term.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...