Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Linux

Submission + - Linux 3.8-rc5 Released, Quietly (paritynews.com)

hypnosec writes: Rather than the usual mailing list announcement for Linux kernel release Linus Torvalds has released Linux 3.8-rc5 quietly. With no announcement prior to release and even a day after the Linux 3.8-rc5 was tagged, Torvalds went onto post a message on Google+ about the release earlier today, The latest release candidate contains over 300 commits; has updates in btrfs, f2fs, ptrace and module loading and comes with quite a few driver updates.

Comment Re:Idiot. (Score 5, Insightful) 633

Or of course, they could have just gone to him, showing their own proof that they had indeed fixed the problem. Thanked him again for not exploiting the weakness in their system and understanding that students trying to learn, be constructive and help others access information easier are the kind you want in your University. Everything after whether correct or incorrect, is understandable coming from a colleague student. People make mistakes. When the College did it, they were given a second chance, because of this guy. When he then made a mistake, no such option was granted. He's better off without the college, and at least he will have learnt a few things. It's all just a shame really.

Comment who actually cares? (Score 0, Offtopic) 102

In all seriousness, When I wrote this this morning, I didn't care, after reading the comments.... nothings changed. I guess we can put this one down to a slow news day! Still better than seeing 1000 news stories about how an inch of snow has yet again crippled Britain.
The Military

Submission + - No Planes in Burma after all? (bbc.co.uk)

FBeans writes: In a story at the end of last year, it was reported that up to 124 Lost WWII Spitfires could be buried in Burma in various locations.

A team sponsored by Wargaming.net lead by David Cundall who says he witnessed one such burial of planes, have been investigating a site that was thought to have up to 36 planes that were buried in crates near the end of the war. However, based on the evidence they have obtained recently, it seems there are no spitfires buried at this location, and no substantial evidence supporting any other location, possibly leading to the end of the hunt?

Over 20,000 Spitfires were made between 1938 and 1948, and cost around £12,000 each.

David Cundal has spent 17 years of his life and around $200,000 dollars hunting the Supermarine planes down; presumably evidence stating there are no planes to find, will not stop him searching.

Comment Re:"Will announce later today..." (Score 2) 163

Further to this, the article hints at Cameron making a mandatory, default filter, however in the original article this is never stated. So arguing about the source is kind of a moot point as the original source never mentions any mandatory filtering. Waiting is a great idea here, this should not have made it to submission.

Comment Re: I can assure you... (Score 1) 642

Worse, you can't leave windows box without antivirus, so you're screwed

It seems a bit silly to use something so insecure that you have to install programs, on top of the OS that will protect what's underneath it. Wouldn't it be better, to create an OS that has security properly, sanely and correctly built in, so one doesn't have to worry about all of this stuff? On another note, I have been using vista, and 7 (and XP) for a few years now, and they all still BSOD occasionally, and I never really know why.

Slashdot is full of folks who've last used Windows more than 10 years ago

Hmm. It seems you made a sweeping generalisation of an entire community, this makes you look like an idiot.

Get with the times and at least update your hate machine.

I updated my "hate machine" this morning. And Last week, I could probably do it again right now. I don't really like the idea of using an OS that has a continuous development process, yet only releases in infrequent discrete points of time.

Comment Re:Dear BPI, (Score 1) 89

Close. It's theoretically true. In practice much of what is said on Slashdot is a carbon copy of something somebody else said. So point 1. You can't copyright something that isn't actually yours. Point 2. Copyright law states that one must actively announce that the content is copyrighted, that it is not to be replicated without consent, and any breaches must be actively fought.

Summary: 'All posters here are copyright holders' - Not true in practical terms, just because we all /can/ be, doesn't mean we all are.

Additionally, copyrighting most Slashdot posts would be like trying to patent a simple and obvious feature on a phone, like 'Slide-to-unlock'. We all understand how insane that is... right?

Comment Remember that time... (Score 3, Informative) 89

Remember that time where the internet was freedom? Where one could create a website, it was subject to law, like any other act. Remember when the providers of the internet buckled under the pressure from "the powers that be". Sites could be blocked, freedom quashed, because somebody didn't like the content of a site, because somebody thought it aided in crime and law breaking, despite not breaking any laws itself.

When we start forcing ISPs to block sites, based on anything other than law, we open gates that will never be closed. One leads to more, more to many and eventually freedom on the internet will be dead.

This is the key issue we are dealing with. It is getting overlooked because "piracy is bad". We have many other questions to ask: does blocking these sites even /help/ the problem of piracy? this suggests not! Is piracy really the problem, perhaps the intermediate companies between consumer and author's of content are to blame somewhat?

Why do we have to constantly start making much larger problems while trying to fix smaller ones. Fix the music industry, the film industry, the E-book-monolopy that Amazon is building, fix the problem at the root. Provide consumers with a modern, suitable market in which they pay the author's of content for their products, for a price that represents the true worth of that product. Allow the consumer to have freedom with that product to use it in any device, in any form. Provide a good service, that is value-for-money, and people /will/ use it. We've seen it work before

Leave the internet alone, once the gates are open the wars begin....

(This is one army, preparing arms...

Comment Re:Free hardware? (Score 2) 229

But really today what are kids going to be using the computer for.

Browsing the Internet.

and nothing else.

These are students. They may be kids, but they are in a computer lab to learn.

Stick a windows OS with IE in-front of them, and you'll get kids browsing the internet. However put a GNU/Linux distribution in front of them, and you could have students that are interested and focused on learning logical and open-source, free Operating systems and software.

With open source we can teach kids that if something isn't there, if something isn't available, we have a few options. One option is to throw money at a corporation like Microsoft. Other options such as creating something yourself, finding multiple technologies or techniques to solve the problem are perhaps a little more constructive. Problem solving, creativity, fairness, team work.... just a few of the many things using and developing free, open-source software teaches us.

Slashdot Top Deals

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...