Comment Re:NVIS, HF, repeaters, etc. (Score 1) 376
For the OP's intended use, HF just isn't as practical as a combination as a VHF/UHF HT and a SPOT type device.
First there's the weight / bulk issue... even an 817 with battery, antenna, microphone. etc , as small as it may be, is a few pounds (about as heavy as 5 or 6 HT's).. that's a considerable amount of weight for most hikers
Then there's frequency.. where in the vast HF spectrum would he call where someone who can actually help *might* be listening to hear him? During the day 20 meters is generally open and with a modest antenna and a few watts it's easy to make a contact hundreds or thousands of miles away. In the early morning or late evening 75/80 meters might open up, but a small antenna and a few watts won't do much there.
And what if he needs help on a Saturday afternoon when there's half a dozen QSO Parties going on and the bands are full of over-processed kilowatts shouting "Contest Contest" and "You're 59.. gimme your call again... again? again?"
Don't get me wrong... I'm a big fan of mobile / portable HF and I play with both regularly, but it really doesn't sound like the right choice for a mountain hiker's first application of ham radio. Perhaps once he gets "the fever" he might choose to spend the extra money and carry the extra hardware for those mountain-top DXpeditions