Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:OH NOES (Score 1) 90

No sarcasm at all! I'm a poor grad student in the humanities, so fancy tech toys are not something I can afford, but when I find something that I like, I stick with it for a long time. With my last phone upgrade, I went with a Palm Centro because it was cheap, and I needed a new device to put my eReader software on, since my old Palm z22 had finally kicked the bucket a few weeks before. I'll probably continue using the phone until the battery starts to fade, but for now, I'm still getting a comfortable 3 days worth of use before it's even lost half of its charge.
Movies

Submission + - Filmmakers Reviving Sci-fi by Going Old School (techzwn.com)

jjp9999 writes: The special effects arms race sci-fi films get stuck in has pulled the genre further and further from its roots of good storytelling and forward-thinking. The problem is that ‘When you create elements of a shot entirely in a computer, you have to generate everything that physics and the natural world offers you from scratch There’s a richness and texture when you’re working with lenses and light that can’t be replicated. The goal of special effects shouldn’t necessarily be to look realistic, they should be works of art themselves and help create a mood or tell a story.’ said filmmakers Derek Van Gorder and Otto Stockmeier. They hope to change this with their upcoming sci-fi film, ‘C,’ which will be shot entirely without CGI or green screens, opting instead for miniature models and creativity. They add that the sci-fi genre has gone wrong in other ways—getting itself stuck in too many stories of mankind’s conflict with technology, and further from the idea of exploration and human advancement. ‘In an era where science and technology are too often vilified, we believe that science-fiction should inspire us to surpass our limits and use the tools available to us to create a better future for our descendants,’ they said.

Comment Re:Says one zealous Dick about another one (Score 1) 1452

Does that mean that if I come up with my own kernel, lets call it Assfuck, using your GNU shit, calling it GNU/Assfuck is appropriate?

It seems to me that, yes, it would be appropriate to call the whole operating system 'GNU/Assfuck' to distinguish it from your Assfuck kernel alone. 'Assfuck' without 'GNU shit' would be pretty lonely and boring, and most uninformed computer-dumb users (with tech knowledge levels as low as my own) would wonder what the point of Assfuck is if there's no shit to play with.

Comment Thank-you for your opinions, prodigies! (Score 1) 659

It's refreshing to see so many other prodigies expressing their opinions on this matter. That's one thing that I like about slashdot--everybody is smarter than everybody else, and it's one of the reasons I love reading everything everybody else has to say.

However, I feel that there is an underrepresentation of the majority at work here: the stupid people, and being one of the token few who make it to slashdot, I feel obligated to express my opinion so that all the smartypantses can understand the perspective of the child's peers. If you stick this kid in too many classes with dumber, older students, you'll de-motivate and humiliate them, which will provoke us into retaliating through socially ostracizing the student. This will deplete his social resources and inevitably drive him to a future of loneliness and depression that will be the cause of his burnout.

I recall fondly the many nerds I de-pantsed in the hallways during my sixth year of high school. Sure, I may not be able to install an operating system without a GUI, but I CAN throw rubber balls in gym class with enough force to smash a kid's plastic frames in two after she makes me feel stupid in math class.

Comment Re:The solution is obvious: (Score 1) 627

The threat of death won't stymie the flow of low-level underlings and lackeys who peddle drugs on street corners. There will always be somebody jobless and hungry, and whether you're stealing a loaf of bread at the threat of your hand getting cut off or selling drugs at risk of getting killed, the severity of punishment is a minor factor in the decision making of these people. Yes, maybe you'd kill off a lot of awful people and social pariahs by doing this, but you'd be killing a lot of momentarily down-on-their-luck normal people, too.

Comment Re:The solution is obvious: (Score 2) 627

Just because there aren't drugs to traffic doesn't mean the problem will be solved. Organized crime will not vanish, but merely shift its business to some other form of social exploitation. There's a lot more than just money involved in this trade, and the cartel members aren't just going to go get normal jobs if the demand for drugs diminishes. It's clear already that they know threats of violence can be used to extort money from teachers--and I hate to think how this might escalate if it became their only source of income. But I do agree with you on the legalization issue. We gotta get tax money from somewhere, and I think drugs would provide a wonderful source of funding for social programs.

Comment I don't understand why... (Score 1) 111

google needs to convert the Ogg Vorbis files over to MP3, which is neither free nor better. What is the reasoning behind this? Would implementing basic support for Ogg Vorbis be beyond the magical powers of google, or did they have to strike up some evil pact of exclusivity and goat sacrifice with the people who own the MP3 patent in order that their product would have a familiar/attractive format de/compression capability?

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...