Comment Re:Have you considered (Score 1) 125
Yes, but I thought he was saying it was dangerous because a nuclear engine could fail, not because a regular chemical rocket launch could fail. If a nuclear engine fails in space, big deal (except for the crew....). But to keep things low-risk, you launch everything dangerous with highly reliable and proven rockets from the earth. It's not going to be risk-free; nothing in life is. But we do have some very reliable rocket engines now, and by the time we're ready to build a nuclear-powered ship to Mars, we should have even more reliable rockets (or, we'll use the same ones we have now, but by that time they'll be even more proven and have more bugs worked out).
The other things we could try are 1) building the nuclear engine here on Earth, but obtaining nuclear fuel from the Moon or an asteroid. I'm not sure how plentiful such fuel would be up there though; didn't they detect thorium or something on the moon? I dunno. 2) This is farther off, but if we could build working fusion engines, there's plenty of He3 on the Moon to power them.