i would LOVE that. I am now using 2 * 1920*1080, and i would gladly trade them in for a 4K. I would love to be able to see more code, multiple windows side by side, and more vertical space would eliminate a lot of scrolling

24" 1920*1080 are pretty cheap right now, Last year I got one for 99€ , but usually they go for about 120 - 130 €. While for a 2560*1440 27", you pay at least 400 €; make that 300€, and I'm getting one NOW.

about 2500 * 1500 should suffice for now.

when will we finally get hihger than 1920*1080 resolution monitors at a decent price ????

and it isn't the building part which we are bad at, it's the managing, planning, ... part we are bad at. I truly wonder if those chines reactors are up to specs, are all millions of parts completely on spec (or are there sub-par components ?)

I take it you haven't had much experience with building contractors yet ? or managers ?

This should be the main focus of distrust in nuclear power; an din my humble opinion the reason why we we shouldn't ever build nuclear power plants ever again.

NO. it's boring. it's very dependent on luck.

maybe you should try out ghost stories http://www.boardgamegeek.com/b... and yggdrasil http://www.boardgamegeek.com/b... . those are "easier". *cough* *cough*. (so I lied, sue me ...)

UT2004, certainly if you can invite some friends over.

>7 - the amount of heat trapping done by CO2 is minimal compared to other effects
Without the greenhouse effect, it would be 30-40 C colder on earth on average.

>Scientists in general and especially climate scientists and the IPCC, need to stay out of the public/political debate
yeah, let's leave the important decissions to lawyers and economists, and not to scientists and engineers. Now THAT would lead to a great society !

but there are still people playing and buying monopoly ... *shudder*

whist! But I rather play a board game. power grid, agricola, pandemic, 7 wonders ...