Looking forward to next months article "we are actually already dead".
Keep pumping that dogma! You can still squeeze a few more pennies out of the rubes before even they see you for the charlatans you are.
Go ahead if you want, my mind wouldn't be changed by hundreds of innocent people being burned alive. That is on the wielder, not the tool... taking one tool away does not mean some other tool cannot be used for whatever grim task the wilder imagines.
Your desire to ban anything dangerous leads to a world where people are incapable of handling any danger. I don't need to bookmark it because your philosophy is already killing hundreds (thousands?) of naive people per day, and growing. The disaster you so grimly anticipate is here, and you are causing it. Whats sad is your complete lack of feeling responsible for the creation of incompetent adults.
To drown it once and for all? Yes, that it does.
If Cruz wins the Republican primaries, it will be hilarious, even if it won't really last long. Unfortunately, that's exactly why he won't win them. We'll get someone boring again, like Bush.
By the same reason regular flamethrowers aren't classed as such?
I'm not sure which country you're from, but chances are good that this kind of flamethrower is actually legal and unregulated there, as well.
"Specifically, H.R. 3964would undermine years of collaboration between local, State, and Federal stakeholders to develop a sound water quality control plan for the Bay-Delta.
That's a joke.....the Bay-Delta water plan is not sound, and no one is happy with it. Everyone agrees it needs to change.....the problem is how to change it.
Safe until it kills millions when a plant blows up.
Unlike, say, coal, which kills millions under normal operations, right?
Or didn't you know that routine coal-mining fatalities are a couple of orders of magnitude more numerous than all fatalities associated with nuclear power? Hell, coal mining fatalities in the 20th century in the USA ALONE were comparable to the death-toll from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.
And then there's the rest of the world's coal mining casualties, plus secondary effects from the pollution.
And never mind that nuclear plants don't "blow up". Unless you fill them up with TNT and set it off, of course.
Considering that nuclear power is the safest form of power the world has ever known, I'd say it's worthy of recognition for offsetting carbon more than anything else. To borrow a phrase, "It's the energy density, stupid."
There's a reason why China has 30 nuclear plants under construction, while the US just approved its first new plant in 30 years.
But knowing you as I do, the underlying science itself is just politics, and that's something built into your personal identity.
I'm not sure what you're saying here.
Are you sure that's what she's remembered for?
Among tech guys, like you, no.
He's probably unelectable thanks to some stupid moves he's made -- he voted against the Violence Against Women Act.
That won't matter.
Walker is still in his first term and he dropped out of college, which is a big negative
That won't matter.
There are several good Republican Governors out there, but they're not on anybody's radar screen. The Governor of New Mexico is one
She doesn't oppose medicinal marijuana, she doesn't oppose same-sex marriage, she does not want to repeal ACA.......essentially you like politicians who agree with your political opinions.
My prediction is that we're going to have a Republican president elected in 2016, and it'll be Jeb Bush. He's going to run against Hillary Clinton.
Ironically, if that happens, we'll have democrat who voted to invade Iraq running against a Bush who didn't.
"Look! There! Evil!.. pure and simple, total evil from the Eighth Dimension!" -- Buckaroo Banzai
