Because there are ample studies saying so.

If you still believe that vaccines could potentially maybe in some cases cause autism, you are a fucking retard at best, a con artist at worst.

Well, in 20 years Windows NT went from 3.x to 6.x, so I'd say it sounds about right...

Perception versus recording. It's a huge difference.

In a word? No.

Unless you don't print much, you'll quickly pay more for gas than you would for printing stuff at home...

Not really. Just properly grounding the thing would fix that.

Blink is pretty bad. Blink plus marquee is nightmare fuel.

What are you talking about?

All versions support all APIs. That means Windows RT supports Win32 (in fact, the WinRT API is just a fancy Win32 wrapper) and x86/x64 support WinRT.
WinRT apps are only distributed through the store, while Win32 applictions are distributed like they've always been. The only exception is that Windows RT refuses to run unsigned Win32 applications, effectively limiting it to Microsoft's bundled stuff, like Office and IE.

You're obviously missing the point of it then. It's magnificent as a notebook (as in sheets of paper, not laptop) replacement that can double as a usable Ultrabook or tablet.

High DPI is going to be an issue until most software is updated to support it, that's true. Doesn't bother me that much though, Office 2013 does fine, as do the browsers.

As for the mouse/trackpad issue: the thing has a touchscreen. Fingers work roughly 40 percent of the time and the Wacom stylus works another 40 percent of the time. That leaves ~10% of tasks that do need a relative pointing device, so I'm not too bothered by trackpads (but I do carry a bluetooth mouse for when I can use it, since it is a more natural experience than the alternatives).

Disclaimer: I don't have a Surface Pro, but there is one in my household and I use a very similar device every day (Samsung Ativ Smart PC Pro - slightly larger with a more traditional keyboard base instead of the Surfaces' kickstand+keyboard combination. Otherwise they're identical when it comes to hardware).

Seriously, these were never really funny. They're also completely irrelevant: the Surface Pros have been selling very well (unlike their crippled ARM siblings).

Not really comparable. The difference here is absolutely irrelevant, except during very heavy use (same silicon, higher maximum clocks).

The Note does, but the lack Wacom digitizer is the least of any average Android tablet's problems.

Actually, it's quite likely the Surface Pro 2 inventory is rather limited.
That's probably what triggered the whole story with the better processor, Intel probably ran out of the regular one (For some mysterious reason, the only difference is a higher maxmimum clock - the price was the same last time I checked).

Why do you care about the camera on a tablet? Especially on something like the Surface Pro, which is more an Ultrabook than a tablet.

As he said: Stupid in a car without gears.