It might help to read the actual paper instead of some hand-waving article.

I really don't think it's demoting anti-MS pages.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=is+windows+expensive&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n

• Is Windows getting more expensive? - CNET News
• Windows 5x More Expensive than Mac OS X
• Windows Vista: One Expensive Operating System!
• Expensive Computer Dead Slow
• Windows, Skylights & Doors | Sierra Club Green Home
• Why is Windows so expensive?
• Windows 5x More Expensive than Mac OS X
• Windows 7 pricing thoughts - Is Windows too expensive? | TalkBack on ...
• RoughlyDrafted: Five Windows Flaws - 5
• Comparison of Windows and Linux - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "In practice, the availability of Windows source code is generally heavily restricted or extremely expensive, if available at all. However, even where source is available ..."

And "is windows expensive" returns just plain anti-Windows results. "why is windows expensive" (eliminating the 'so') returns more neutral responses. This is just a difference in the search algorithms. I wonder how many phrases were tried before the authors obtained suitably pro-MS results for their troll.

I was only pointing out that copy protection mechanisms are not immediately defeated, contrary to popular belief. I wouldn't buy anything with StarForce or SecuROM, either. You'll need to ask the companies that decide to implement such technologies about the cost/benefit analysis.

If I had mod points I'd mod you up. I don't know why everyone around here is under the impression that all copy protection is broken virtually before release. It took over a year to crack starforce. Besides, most publishers are just looking to buy themselves a few days so that the people desperate to get it will go ahead and buy it when they can't find a torrent.

Of course -- and I realize you're being sarcastic -- they are doing what you say, AND their job postings have made it clear they are also working on a "next-gen" MMO.

Did you think maybe it is not the brightest idea to post one's salary on the Internet?

I can't find an online reference for this, but supposedly Warren Buffet once started out an earnings call with, "We would have done much better this year if I had never come in to work."

I think what he meant to say was, "dishonest students will never give up their notes" -- regardless of what the honest students do.

Or even just stay as a pontificating lazy idiot, but possibly when something is done by a trained researcher and published a well respected scientific journal not assume they methodology was stupid?

Well, this is keeping in the slashdot tradition -- how many times has the "correlationisnotcausation" tag been (mis)used?

It just seems to me like anyone not capable of answering that question would also not be capable of answering just about anything more complex. So if your screening test is actually targeted to a higher-level recruit, why even bother putting that question on the test? It should be pretty clear from the other responses when a candidate is grossly incapable.

Page 18.

if they try to answer the "Swap the values of A and B" with out creating a 3rd variable

Why would you even ask that if you weren't looking for a "clever" answer? Or are the caliber of people you're looking for so stupid that many of them might not know how to swap the values of two variables?

Here's another good test question, "you are writing a screening test. Do you put trick questions on it?"

That's actually a really interesting idea, at least for the order taking.

Of course it's debatable whether or not a speech recognition program would do a better job.