Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Can't get there from here (Score 1) 709

Well, it's still like this. One problem at a time.

1. In co-operative multitasking, the computer oompaloompas work on the calculator one at a time and let their boss know when the calculator is free to use. The working oompaloompa can also decide to take a break, leave their work on the desk and let someone else do their work while they do not need the calculator.

2. In pre-emptive multitasking the boss tells an oompaloompa to start working. The oompaloompa is forced to work until their work is done or the boss decides to hit it with a stick and put some other oompaloompa to work. Poor oompaloompa does not know how much time he has and when he gets hit, he has to drop his work immediately.

3. In symmetric multiprocessing the oompaloompas have multipla calculators but only one table and a filing cabinet. The oompaloompas have to coordinate together how to organize their work, so they don't scribble on each others notes, while they take turns on the calculator. The boss is usually in charge of the desk space and the filing cabinet.

4. In distributed vector... I think I write something about hungry philosopher oompaloompas now! They are not good with forks. Or something... Anyway, what was I speaking of? Oh yeah, I'm thirsty. Mmmm... Sluuuuuurmmm...

Comment Re:No surprise (Score 1) 342

By your id, I'd imagine you were chewing on punch cards when the dinosaurs roamed the earth, but you seem to be fucking clueless about ARM.
ARM is not "a processor" or a specific set of instructions.
There IS a specific set of ARM designs that are "industry standard", such as ARM%, THUMB, Cortex, etc. It is cheap to license one of these, fab your own and be compatible with everyone else who licensed the same stuff. ARM processors are not "unable" to do anything. They are complete processors and by definition can do anything you throw at them. If you want to decode blueray faster -- fine -- just spec a proc with a dedicated unit for it. Or use a separate die for it.

ARM is a god damn godsend compared to other designs at the moment. In fact, I'm not sure if anyone could streamline chip design like that in next 10 years like ARM has done.

Anyway, consider yourself scolded by a kid who is a certified lauterbach ARM debugger and has prodded pretty much every Nokia device in between 2001-2008.

Comment Re:Bored, busy, or hipster (Score 1) 385

My point being... Those who have not owned a TV in a long time, it is something they do not even think about. However, an offhand remark about not owning a TV might sound so remarkable that it really jumps out to someone, who cannot even start to imagine a household without a TV. I mean, "what the fuck do they do then? Play cards and socialize with their families!? Outrageous better-than-thou attitude you bastard!".
In fact, I bet most of us who don't own a TV find their own ways of being antisocial veggie.
I am right now laying on a couch with chocolate and coffee at side, reading slashdot. I promise you! In no way my "I don't own a TV"-comment implies that I am somehow less of an oaf and lazy bastard than thou.

Comment Re:Bored, busy, or hipster (Score 1) 385

Meh, in 1999 I moved from my student flat and gave away my old TV to the guy who was helping me move. I had full intentions of buying a new one, but never did. Coincidentally, 2 years prior I got my first broadband internet...

I usually GLOAT about how I don't EVEN OWN a TV when someone at work starts talking about the latest do-you-want-to-be-a-rock-star-millionare-talent-wife-hubby-dancer-prancer-rudolph-show and want to be polite and ask my opinion too.

Open Source

Desktop Linux Is Dead 1348

digitaldc writes with this quote from PCWorld: "It kills me to say this: The dream of Linux as a major desktop OS is now pretty much dead. Despite phenomenal security and stability — and amazing strides in usability, performance, and compatibility — Linux simply isn't catching on with desktop users. And if there ever was a chance for desktop Linux to succeed, that ship has long since sunk. ... Ultimately, Linux is doomed on the desktop because of a critical lack of content. And that lack of content owes its existence to two key factors: the fragmentation of the Linux platform, and the fierce ideology of the open-source community at large."

Comment Re:3-D (Score 4, Insightful) 261

"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Picasso

I guess that's what you get when people have no foresight

That statement is as insightful as ever.
Just think about what it implies. Of course, I do not know if it truely was an ignorant comment, but to me it reads as very terse, subtle and clever commentary about human nature

Slashdot Top Deals

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...