I don't quite understand why we need crowdsourcing to come up with 3D printable models. Can't we take the 1000's of existing 3D models currently used in CAD programs and video games and convert them into a format that can be printed?

Kill it. Every other language has evolved quite a bit since Javascript came on the scene. I want strong typing, OOP, properties, reflection, LINQ, parallel support, threads, powerful collections (including concurrent collections) lambda expressions, dynamic language features. Admittedly it has some of these, but I want them all.

LINQ is awesome! I agree that there are some subtle differences between the queries that you would write in LINQ and the queries you would write in Slashem. The great thing about LINQ is that it's available right there in your main C# codebase and you can use it to query XML files, databases, and even your own arrays and collections of objects. It has changed how I code and drastically improved my coding efficiency.

I've been using LINQ for years and it's great. It's just like this Slashem concept but it's built-in to a manistream language: C#/VB. With LINQ you write your queries inline with the rest of your C# or VB code. They're not in a quoted string or separate resource file. You get the full syntax highlighting and intellisense as well as the red squiggly underline when you've done something wrong. They are type-safe and they play nicely with the language's collection classes. LINQ-to-Entities and LINQ-to-SQL are the variants that query databases (MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server, etc.). There are other variants like LINQ-to-XML and LINQ-to-Objects that can perform traditional relational queries against XML files or against your own objects and collections. You can mix and match these types of LINQ queries effortlessly. It's so powerful, easy to read and convenient that it has fundametally changed how I code.

No his signature is correct. There seems to be a perception that Google is somehow an "open-source corporation." That's just not true. Google is no more open source than Oracle/Sun. Sure, they're happy to ride on the backs of other people's effort, but they contribute very little to the community. At lease MS has the guts to make their own programming languages, IDE, database, web server, cloud system, dektop and mobile OS and game console instead of stealing these products from open source projects.

Have you ever actually tried to use that "smash hit" Android OS? It's a terrible user experience. It's stuffed with all kinds of ugly, buggy, crashing apps. There is no consistency and no style. It's just a jumble of haced together code with no sense of design. I dropped my DroidX in one week and now I'm a happy WP7 user.

That's right, everyone's a shill. Now let's all go back to our rooms and calm down.

Use Google for search? Why, so they can censor my results and make everything rosy? I don't think so.

I think you are talking about Google here, the wolf in sheep's clothing.

They are all completely closed, even Google. There is no difference. Just because Google pays lip service to open source by using other people's products doesn't mean they care a lick about the community. Google is not your friend.

Apparently you do. You're here reading this article and commenting, aren't you? Seems to me like you can't get enough of the micro stuff.

You wish.

What about the OS I started working on in my garage? That's still completely untethered to any manufacturer. Of course, I've only written about 12 lines of code so far...

Something tells me Microsoft would jump at the chance to give the same deal to any of the other manufacturers who are interested in accepting it. That sounds pretty equal to me.

Romney in 2012!