Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So which other candidate is better? (Score 2) 334

The states didn't enforce slavery, fugitive slave laws did. If the south had been allowed to secede, slavery wouldn't have lasted long.

You should check out the book "Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men" for a more nuanced understanding of slavery than what you've been taught in Lincoln-worshiping publik skools.

Comment Re:So which other candidate is better? (Score 1) 334

So Ron Paul doesn't want to repeal the Roe v Wade decision and set women's rights in the US back 30 years?

If Ron makes any supreme court appointments, his litmus will be : "Can you read?"

The Constitution doesn't give the Federal government any authority over such matters. Murder, manslaughter, health, etc. aren't federal issues, so why is abortion?

I'm pro-choice and the best affect will be removing this wedge issue from federal politics. The fundies will go away and we can get our house in order!

Comment Re:Stallman who made Linux possible (Score 4, Insightful) 1452

What planet are you from?

Stallman didn't make Linux possible, BSD did. Are you suggesting no other compilers or debuggers existed?

Stallman didn't make MacOS possible. Again, BSD did. Safari doesn't use any of Stallman's code, and if LGPL didn't exist (a license Stallman wasn't a fan of), another would have been used.

Stallman's contributions are gdb, hot air, and beard grease and the only reason gcc/gdb became popular is the same reason UNIX became popular: it was available. Apple doesn't even use gcc anymore and its days may be numbered.

Steve Jobs wanted to make a computer for everyone, Stallman couldn't give a damn how difficult they are to use so long they use his license.

HURD:0 Apple:Billions

The only reason you've been modded up is because of FSF zealots who have nothing better to do than troll slashdot. If people rated your post on the facts you would get a -5 flaimbait

Comment Re:Great (Score 1) 392

It became clear after a time that the Articles were insufficient to bound the states together

I have never heard or read a good argument to make this case. I have read arguments against it, however, such as that from Rothbard.

Fortunately, we can go back to the Articles when this federal government debacle implodes.

Comment Re:Split it (Score 1) 392

Worst idea ever. You're clearly ignorant about how politics works. The government and special interests (especially bureaucrats) will tax, borrow, and spend as much as they can. The only check to this is the ability to get around it. Notice how states and cities have to balance budgets.

Once you impose a federal tax, you'll never be rid of it nor will the people have control over how much they tax (beyond how much blood they have left in their veins).

The only income the federal government should get should be provided by state governments, period. That is the only way to make them accountable. No income tax, no savings tax (inflation), and no import tax (tariffs).

Slashdot Top Deals

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...