And they wonder why people wear Burquas.
Mohammed, at the cutting edge of the consumer fight back

Are you US based, out of interest ?

Some kill themselves.
Like Aaron Schwarz

And who brings on the brighter kid, handicapped by his dull team-member ?

Peltiers manage around 5% conversion efficiency.

He, some of MY friends were students when Tom Kilburn was head of CS at Manchester. We went to a lot of the Manchester 50 events, with our baby son. I doubt he remembers.

Not true. The greater decline in manufacturing came under Blair and Brown. At the end of Mrs Thatcher's time as PM, manufacturing fell from 25.8 per cent to 22.5 per cent, under Blair/Brown, manufacturing accounted for more than 20 per cent of the economy in 1997, the year Labour came to power, by 2007, that share declined to 12.4 per cent.

That ONS figures

Yeah right, like you'll be able to tell the effects of 1Mt of bomb in 100Mt of impact damage

Nukes can be designed to have a lot of residue, or not a lot of residue. I'll take mildly radioactive rocks than a wiped out city.

Hal Clements wrote "Mission of Gravity" and "Iceworld" where physics and chemistry is extrapolated into wonderful new types of world - the Ellipsoidal "Mesklin" in Mission of Gravity for example.

Also, Robert D Forward's "Dragon's Egg" about life on a Neutron star's surface is an exploration of nuclear chemistry.

Bullshit. See: My Lai massacre. The Nuremburg defence was accepted.

Find yourself an F-1 engine primer.... The turbines were powered by a BIG generator based ( I think) on hypergolic fuels. 170 pounds of gas a second pushing a , pumping around 500 gallons a second of kerosene into the combustion chamber by a turbine powered pump.

First designed in 1957 !!!

Steve

....and all CMOS sensors are inferior to CCDs for noise at low light levels, so this is just a good CMOS sensor. CCD noise, when cooled, is measured in electrons per hour.

I just sent a copy of your comments to a whole bunch of my friends who say the same thing.
Absolutely right.

This same research has been rejected by every other climate and atmospheric research journal, by the peer review process.
Key researchers are omitted from the paper - like Judith Curry, who I suspect will have something to say, since she was a key member of the BEST project.
Go figure.