Comment The TSA has a new toy.. (Score 1) 162
It's gonna make going through airport security even more fun. Especially for those with pacemakers.
It's gonna make going through airport security even more fun. Especially for those with pacemakers.
It would not surprise me to learn that in some form, software developed in the 1960s is still in use today.
This is coming from someone who had to hack Fortran code as recently as 2009.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.
A draft is possible, and I believe would be somewhat automatic if war were declared. Certain types of rationing would be.
The thing that stops the draft is the reality of the fact that military organizations have no means of dealing with large numbers of people who *really* don't want to be there. In the '60s, the military system had a distinct benefit with the fact that the primary opposition to the draft was a counterculture which was relatively unified in a commitment to non-violent protest.
The age bracket in question is, today, decidedly not non-violent. Opposition to a draft today might not take the form of "flower power" and "sit ins." More likely, it would provoke the militia movement into actual violence.
It's much easier to imagine a draft than it is to imagine some of the other things that would happen in a declared war.
For example, rationing of commodities. Compulsory conversion of industrial production from civilian to war efforts. Seizure of raw materials.
Requirements for businesses to take compensation in the form of interest-bearing bonds which are not redeemable during the conflict.
All things that my parents were subjected to...
I can't imagine the post "greed is good" generation or the "corporate personhood" set to accept any of this, or even to believe that it happened within living memory.
Are you a consumer of audio, or are you producing it?
The requirements and objectives of these two groups are wildly different. These discussions generally divide consumers into groups, instead of dividing consumers ("audiophiles" and "casual listeners") from producers ("recording" and "synthesizing").
I don't know if the people from the "consumers" group can understand just how important my "sound cards" are (a good old Delta 1010 and a Focusrite Scarlett 18i20), and my system would probably be a royal pain for someone whose objective is A/V theatre, gaming, or music listening.
It's good that some of the consumer gear has been converging on pro gear, because it means that for playback at least, we now have inexpensive systems with audio fidelity beyond the threshold of human perception. Awesome as that is, other things are important to people who are producing audio, and not all of us have "audio production budgets."
The Russians will release the complete Snowden Archive.
Congratulations, that's one of the stupidest things I've ever read on
"They are the only people who would have actually earned it."
Everyone here is dumber for having read that.
I would much rather them use existing tried tech and incrementally advance them rather than try a radical new design.
Except that they're not. Those solid boosters? They're "based on" Shuttle SRBs, not identical to them. Several segments longer, meaning higher internal pressures, different burn characteristics, etc. If you don't think that's going to take extra years of testing, there are several bridges I'd be happy to sell you.
Ditto for any other technologies that they're basing stuff on rather than reusing identically.
The SLS isn't also known as the "Senate Launch System" for nothing. NASA's role should be to try radical new designs, not serve as a conduit for senators to shovel pork to their constituents.
Yep. Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen
(Okay, there's a fair bit of hydrogen in our mix, too.)
And I still don't trust it.
you need to learn how to read BADLY.
Wouldn't it be better to learn to read well, than to learn how to read badly?
And it would be good also to learn to write well. Your prior post is utterly incomprehensible.
Part of my understanding is that a 501(c)3 is a public, mutual benefit corporation where all assets are actually owned by the public, should push come to shove.
I'm sorry, but you're confused -- that's not correct at all. The assets of a 501(c)3 have to be transferred to another exempt organization if the organization shuts down, but they are in no way owned by the public. We had that baked into our articles of incorporation but I'm not sure if that's a requirement.
501(c)3s can include religious corporations and public-benefit nonprofit corporations. A public corporation is something completely different, a corporation set up by a government; for example, some state universities are set up this way. A mutual-benefit corporation, which includes some co-ops, insurance companies, and other groups set up to benefit their members, cannot be a 501(c)3.
but the IRS's definition of a charity requires that you be serving a distinct, disadvantaged group of people.
No. 501(c)3 organizations can include churches in rich neighborhoods, symphony orchestras, museums, and plenty of other groups which do not serve "disadvantaged" groups.
PHP is the language for web programming, just as C/C++ is the language for system programming.
People have been hating on C since at least the 1980s. It's still here. People have been hating on PHP since 2000 or so. It's still here.
The feds threat was six months, not 10+ years.
Bullshit. Threatening "50 years if you make us go to trial, but if you confess we'll recommend six months but the court can still give you 50 years" is still threatening 50 years. The threat of heavy sentences to get people to waive the right to a trail is an egregious violation of due process and the the guarantee against cruel and unusual punishments.
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." - Voltaire