Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:By this logic... (Score 1) 451

I know quite a bit about the HIPAA, and I don't appreciate your insults. The "P" stands for "portability", and not "privacy"; The privacy rule is a very small part of the HIPAA. For instance, there's nothing in the HIPAA about an expectaction of privacy of said records in reference to criminal investigations. "Privacy" in the HIPAA deals with how those with legitimate access to your records may disclose it to other providers, business partners, etc. There are specific allowances, too, so that providers may share your records with law enforcement when required by law with regard to abuse cases/mandated reporting, etc. But nothing in it says that a warrant must be obtained in order for law enforcement to view your records. I'm sure that many facilities would insist on a warrant, and most investigators would comply. By using this judge's logic however, one could *certainly* draw the same analogy that I did in order to obtain such records without a warrant.

Comment My suggestions: (Score 1) 1021

Inherit the Stars, by James P. Hogan, is a _fantastic_ look at *science*-based science fiction. The novel tells the story of a bunch of scientists trying to unravel the mystery of a 50,000 year old human found on the moon.

Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. Because, yes, it *is* a work of science fiction, but also a wonderful book with rich themes and an incredible philosophy behind it. And that we're basically living it these days doesn't hurt to make it seem more relevant.

Comment Re:It's so very odd..... (Score 3, Insightful) 1376

Leonard Peikoff had it right on Agnostics:

"The agnostic miscalculates. He thinks he is avoiding any position that will antagonize anybody. In fact, he is taking a position which is much more irrational than that of a man who takes a definite but mistaken stand on a given issue, because the agnostic treats arbitrary claims as meriting cognitive consideration and epistemological respect. He treats the arbitrary as on a par with the rational and evidentially supported. So he is the ultimate epistemological egalitarian: he equates the groundless and the proved. As such, he is an epistemological destroyer. The agnostic thinks that he is not taking any stand at all and therefore that he is safe, secure, invulnerable to attack. The fact is that his view is one of the falsest--and most cowardly--stands there can be."

Slashdot Top Deals

Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"

Working...