The court denied this motion suggesting that because the hard drive failed, there was no evidence to destroy in the first place.
Okay I skimmed the article, but I couldn't find a comment suggesting that.
It seems more that there's no evidence that the defendant wilfully destroyed evidence. The plaintiff wanted the court to assume that there was harmful evidence on the hard drive, simply because the defendant had thrown it out. The defendant on the other hand threw it out simply because it was dying, and had no idea that it might be relevant in the litigation.
Calling someone's mom and telling them their son has been making rape threats and harassing women on the internet is not doxxing.
No. This is fine. If any of them did only do that I wouldn't have posted, but it seems that this was not the case for any of them. Alanah Pearce seems to be pretty sensible with her reaction. Telling their parents means that we can reasonably assume that things are going to be kept in control.
Doxxing involves potentially setting off an online mob, or in some cases, interfering in their lives.
There's a reason doxxing is mainly associated with 4chan, 8chan and other pedophile websites.
Jezebel writer doxxes autistic kid.
Rebecca Watson promotes Doxxing.
Reddits ShitRedditSays subreddit digging up names of gamergaters.
A tumblr related website all about doxxing
Something about throwing stones in glass houses springs to mind here.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.