Eh, neither. RAID != backup.
The only way out is backups, at which point RAID doesn't give you any extra data security.
RAID is for performance.
The IPCC doesn't do research. It "reviews and assesses" the science in order to "provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic consequences".
http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization.htm
Did you miss the part where I was indicating sarcasm?
And I have an iPhone, and I haven't tried to jail-break it. Once someone buys something, they're free (in my mind) to do whatever the hell they want to with it.
To sum up:
You're a good doggie, but you're barking up the wrong tree.
Yea, men are more capable of stopping a bullet or 2000 pound bomb than women and children are?
Really? Thats news to pretty much everyone on the planet I think.
I guess thats why they let women into the military now, because men and women are equally adapt at defending themselves against cruise missiles, laser guided bombs and depleted uranium bullets than all that stuff back in the early 40s.
You've never held a weapon have you?
If you're coding in lots of explicit memory reference deletes, what you're writing is not C++ but C. A C++ codebase would use RRID and automatic memory management to obviate the need for any explicit memory management. My last C++ project at work contained zero (yes, zero) calls to delete/free() out of around 20000 lines of code and a year of development/testing.
You're making the same mistake you're accusing C++ developers of making - you're viewing C++ through Java lenses.
"And remember: Evil will always prevail, because Good is dumb." -- Spaceballs