Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:They're ALL Betas (Score 1) 237

How much do you want to bet that sometime in the very near future, under Tools | Options (yes, I still use the menus, f*** off), under Advanced, the Update tab will vanish, and all meaningful ability to control Firefox updates will vanish?

If Firefox had had some actual innovative ideas recently, I wouldn't (necessarily) have a problem, but they seem to have been copying Opera and especially Chrome, without actually thinking about WHY Opera and Chrome did what they did. Cargo cult, anyone?

Comment Obama has a point, but methinks he lacks finesse (Score 2, Insightful) 545

The speech writer was a bit off their game that day from the sounds of it. There are way to many writers currently confusing message with medium, and gadgets with tools. If the user is focussed or disciplined, it all becomes much more about what they are trying to do. So no, Obama, our brains are not rotting from too much ibox. Maybe if the Obama administration made some proactive legislation around data privacy, rights to anonymity, restrictions on advertising in public commons, rather than slinging mud around about simple living, just because the wifey gardens.

Comment Re:Silly Brits (Score 1) 568

So what you're saying is that this guy would get elected because he had an enormous majority of voter support... ... and the problem is?

The problem, fuckbrain, is that in a lot of constituencies a large number of voters are effectively disenfranchised, and that overall the two main parties end up with an unrealistically high percentage of seats compared with their overall share of the vote.

Also, if you are the MP for a constituency with a large labour or tory majority, you don't have to worry about being a good MP, and the notion of local accountability becomes laughable.

Comment Re:I can't wait (Score 1) 273

because there's more people not being paid to circumvent protection than there is people being paid to protect. or because every possible method of protection has a possible method of circumvention, and there is no ultimate method of protection. same goes for war, build the best armour you can, and someone will make a better bullet.

Comment Re:Secure e-voting (Score 1) 179

You simply implement the exact same procedures for dealing with a ballot box that had been tampered with. I do not see what the difficulty is here

1 - They don't have to let you spend some time alone with the box as part of the voting process.
2 - It's harder to tamper with the box in a way that makes it impossible to detect until after the elections are over.

Comment Amazing findings (Score 2, Insightful) 179

Amazing work they've done here. They've proven that if you have intrusive access to the hardware, you can screw it up and do deviant shit. How about you post an article when someone can walk into a polling place, hack a machine, and walk out without take a screwdriver or some large, obvious device to a voting machine?

This article, like most of the front page needs "-1, Irrelevant".

Comment Re:My 3 month old... (Score 2, Insightful) 149

I'm guessing that either he's fucking weird (certainly possible considering his parents) or all children love to watch shit. While he gets excited when I come home from work, it's nothing like he gets when he's watching my parents on Google Video Chat. If he's going to feel excited via a particular medium then I say I'm all for it--especially if it helps one particular child learn better than others.

He's not weird. Or no weirder than normal.

He likes to look at things, check. He's still learning to see, so any NEW thing will be interesting to him.

He's more interested in watching your parents on GVC, check. You're one of the two most important things in his universe. But you're old news compared to this little picture that talks and looks like Granma and Grampa. Though frankly he'd be just as interested in total strangers - he's after NEW.

The only problem with TV will come when you decide to use it as a babysitter. At that point, it becomes bad. Until then, it's just more novelty for the wee lad.

While he has some attention for books, especially ones where my mother recorded herself reading them and we play it for him while he listens

He's too young for books, other than as more NEW stuff.

That said, mother reading to him is better than mother recording things for him to listen to later.

Starting in about two years, you'll have your chance to start him on a lifetime of reading. There's pretty much one simple way to do that - read. Not necessarily to him, though that certainly helps. But if he sees you and his mother sitting down to an evening of reading most every night, he'll want to do it too. And once he starts, he'll never stop....

Comment Lots of pieces of this exist. (Score 1) 363

Some combination of FOAF profiles, StatusNet updates, OpenID, and Drupal 7 would do. Mainly "FOAF" or "Friend of a Friend"---it lets you describe your profile. Drupal 7 is to have some integration with this, and it has modules for galleries and forums and whatnot. Then you'd have a social network you control. Except, I don't think FOAF has any real sort of privacy setting. What I think we need (please point out if someone's taken a good stab at this!) is some similar standard for describing a profile that has good use of public key encryption to allow you to effectively allow different information to different groups, so you can say these few people's friends of friends can see this information, these people over here are coworkers and they can see this but their friends can't see anything except what is already public, etc. without having to trust some central broker to provide this privacy as you do currently.

Comment Re:Advice, Dawg (Score 2, Insightful) 842

Bullshit. Quoting Shakespeare in context can be unfeasibly intelligent. There's a skill in using a quote (fictional or otherwise) to comment on something.

By using a quote, you can infer the entire context of that quote, and apply it to the current situation. Thus an eight word quote can replace a twenty minute explanation of why something is so utterly fucked up.

Meanwhile you haven't had to explicitly say something's fucked up, so you haven't pissed anybody off, the person that's fucking it up will be too stupid to understand the quotation, where it came from and its implications so you wont piss them off, and if they do understand it then they'll be intelligent enough to appreciate the position and deal with it.

Learn how to use quotes well. It's a Nineteenth century skill that's sadly passed into disuse, probably because of fuckwits thinking it's emotionally immature.

Comment Re:"Could" is too soft a word (Score 0, Troll) 175

So, are you claiming that the patent application is now correctly priced? Why shouldn't we make it lower? Are some small businesses priced out of the market? If it were changed to $0.01 per application, would small business owners then thrive? Or would they be strangled by the plethora of patent trolls that popped up? Are we already strangled by the plethora of patent trolls out there? It is easy to say "change is bad", but is the status quo not already bad?

Slashdot Top Deals

Suggest you just sit there and wait till life gets easier.

Working...