Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:They're worthless. (Score 1) 213

EVERY cert test I've ever taken tests not knowledge of the subject/product, but the ability to do rote memorization of the training materials, even if it's wrong. It's all a moneymaking scam.

Agreed. I took a JavaScript course and they insisted that the Java reserve words were also reserve words in JS, despite that version of JS being scrapped. They went so far as to include it in the final exam. The course was also 9 years out of date.

Comment Re:Who makes these decisions? (Score 1) 628

The recommendation was that people use Pro instead of Home to workaround the automatic install issue, presumably that's for everyone because in Microsoft's and the AC mind everyone is in the same situation and there will never be any bugs/failures/oddities/malware/times you want to use your computer & not install updates, etc.

Comment Re:There are always options. (Score 1) 628

OK, troll, let's try this again.

The plain and simple fact is the folks that wrote the fucking OS likely DO know better than the average idiot who doesn't even know what Windows Update is, or why they should do it, which is why it is turned on automagically for that particular crowd.

Retard and be paranoid all you want in the enterprise. Scrutiny is far more critical there. I'd prefer not to continue to populate the earth with massive botnets due to ignorance, or more specifically mentalities like yours.

You do realize the irony here right? The "folks that wrote the fucking OS" are pushing out patches because they fucked up something and need to fix it. Even in the past 6 months MS has had to pull patches because they were breaking peoples systems. You want that on a mass scale?

Comment Re:There are always options. (Score 1) 628

Make the entire folder read-only. Done. But this begs the question: what kind of anal retentive asshole would not want to receive Windows security updates? Why is this even an issue? If I upgrade to Windows 10, I want every security update the second it comes out. Sooner, if possible.

It's not the wanting of the security updates more than the timing of security updates. I set aside a time to handle this sort of maintenance, do it all at once and then I'm done with it until the next time. I don't want to be dealing with it on their schedule. I certainly don't want to be in the middle of a project/game/anything and all the sudden my system tells me I have X minutes before it reboots for a security update. I don't care if it can be postponed, I don't even want the warning to interrupt what I'm doing.

Comment Re:Who makes these decisions? (Score 1) 628

MS's approach actually seems sensible to me and for the better good.
1) If you know enough about patches to delay them, and manually manage them you should probably be using Windows Pro anyways.

There are innumerable times where it's just inconvenient to install patches. Then there's issues like early Win8 patches were causing system instability. Then there's the out of date drivers that are wanting to be installed when you've already installed ones that are multiple versions newer - it just doesn't know that.

2) This will help discourage businesses from using Windows home in the business which is a good thing.

Except that the more the two differ the less work you'll be able to get your employees to do at home/more training you'll have to do hiring new employees/etc

3) Hopefully this will create better communication with MS and 3rd party software vendors so they can release updates which don't break things. (which is less likely to happen to home users anyways... in my experience it's the highly custom proprietary software inside of companies that usually breaks)

hahaha - you're kidding right?

4) this has an easy work around... use the Pro version instead of Home, which is what I normally recommend anyways. I used to charge 2x the hourly rate to work on home versions of XP, Vista.... not as bad with Win 7, etc... but still...

Fair enough, but if everyone is using the pro version instead of home, why have the home version that just annoys/insults/abuses users?

Comment Re:Secure Boot (Score 1) 628

Also I would add business. I know business versions are unaffected by this, but it could still be a sign of things to come. The average office cemented themselves into the Microsoft ecosystem decades ago. Off the top of my head I could count at least a dozen critical applications my company absolutely can't live without that are Windows only.

How many have been tried with windows emulation on Linux?

Comment Re:Lost track of Sequence (Score 1) 106

My roommate bought one that came with Vista in 2007, it had better specs, and she would swear at it non-stop because it would always be running something in the background/slow doing nothing but word processing. Does my anecdote trump yours?

I'm on Win8.1, I'd upgrade to Win7 if I could, Win10 isn't touching my system until I can confirm without a doubt that it doesn't suck as much as Win8.1. If that's the case, it'll get installed but no way am I subscribing to the yearly release Microsoft wants. My next system will be Microsoft free.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...