"Feel like a programmer" isn't the problem. Knowing that something is technically correct, but being unable to instantly verify that it is aesthetically pleasing is a major hangup. Unless you're making a professional report, or writing a book, there's no benefit to: hand-encoding a text, rendering it, editing the code, re-rendering it, tweaking the code, re-re-rendering it, tweaking the code again, re-re-re-rendering it... ad infinitum. In order for all that work to be worth it, the project must call for absolute perfection.
For a vast majority of writings out there, "good enough" is good enough.
To me, "good enough" goes as follow: I type my text in LaTeX/org/rst/markdow depending on the context (scientific paper, random note, collaborative document, coding-related text) and that's it.
What I say when I learn LaTeX to someone is "LaTeX is there to make your life easy and save time, don't mess with the layout." The result is a nice layout and someone who didn't waste time wysiwyg-ing all the way, which takes a lot of time.
Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.