Comment Re:"Donations" to Charities (Score -1, Troll) 141
you're an ignorant hypocrite... anything would be better i suppose.
you're an idiot.
you're an ignorant hypocrite... anything would be better i suppose.
you're an idiot.
I highly doubt that Charities are getting charged chargeback fees for something that they did not do themselves and you made up the amount of 250,000 because there is no way the banks would be able to justify the fees for a quarter of the total amount.
I highly doubt that Charities are getting charged chargeback fees for something that they did not do themselves and you made up the amount of 250,000 because there is no way the banks would be able to justify the fees for a quarter of the total amount.
i highly doubt that you, or any of the idiots that moderated your ignorant comment as "insightful" know anything about how e-commerce works. if you accept payments, you are charged a fee. there is no getting around that fee.
if no fee was assessed for chargebacks, then anyone could stress the payment gateway systems, possibly disabling them, by flooding the system with payments and matching chargebacks. there is no way the moderators could justify their claim that your comment was insightful.
you're an idiot.
Furthermore, they accuse Namecheap of playing foul because they released a statement before ever contacting godaddy directly to resolve these issues.
just like SOPA would allow them to do... domain seizure with no trial or recourse is most certainly foul.
SOPA isn't just dumb because it tries to censor... it's dumb because it fails to censor... that's probably why go daddy thought it was safe to support it... it would only drive a push to IPv6 and new domains being purchased.
any company that supports SOPA will lose my business forever. i'm never going to pay for UFC PPV, and i was planning on buying the dec 30th one to see brock lesnar fight... no more.
if the data is in video memory on the device, the data is on the device. you're an idiot.
if you want security, roll your own on every level.
Why do ACs insist on remaining anonymous while coming up with gems like this? This is good writing, funny and insightful. But anonymous.
why do morons who provide bad writing like this insist on cowering behind a pair of nonsensical letters and numbers anonymously.
you're an ignorant hypocrite.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen less than jc80 based pseudonym, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
"get a them"????? you're an unentertaining idiot, which also makes you an ignorant hypocrite.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
obviously ur mum's face missed another point in TFA - you're an idiot, tom.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen masculinity based pseudonym, lady feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
you think that i was caught? you think your femininity has anything to do with anything? that is very telling, tom.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen masculinity based pseudonym, lady feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.p. you're completely pathetic.
you are exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.
Well as long as the air remains breathable here, then I would sat that it is worth it.
well as long as a stream doesn't exist that moves air around the world in the way that a jet would, i would sat you'll be fine.
you're an idiot.
slashdot = stagnated
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra