Comment Re:Oh boy (Score 2) 188
a shitty product should be shat upon regardless of actually being smart enough to not pay for it.
a shitty product should be shat upon regardless of actually being smart enough to not pay for it.
and the judiciary is part of which conglomerate?
landshark drones?
"FCC doesn't look to kindly upon"
wasn't planning to show it a nipple.
also "truck won't be too far from the drone" unless you arm it with HARM what good is that going to do?
the question really isn't about privacy, but rather about freedom. Not the freedom as is touted but rather freedom from consequences of no-privacy.
repercussions of free speech without the protection of anonymity would be one. Just look at any whistle blower in recent history. That is at a governmental scale. However just think about having your private words, pictures, correspondence in public domain with the narrow minded social infrastructure that current US society displays in its fervor...
Make a provocative comment and be censured from work, friends and future prospects...
I am willing to buy the argument, if you are not guilty you shouldn't have anything to hide when the society is at a socially elevated level to accept people as they are without judgement... and no I won't hold my breath for that to happen.
America does want that, the fear mongering and bigotry runs rampant in just enough of America to allow this to continue.
May be one day enough America may not want it... might be too late by then.
"enhances the experience for users"
that's why super-fish is mandatory and installed on all their corporate PCs?
as it turns out, not one of my devices or the any blob inside is hammer proof.
i hope this pigeon makes it to
the empire must fall some how... that is the the sound of inevitability...
"leaving law enforcement a way in"
like a warrant?
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"