My results for Chrome 10.0.612.3 were around the 12k mark too, which seems to show that the browser performance is no where near what our CPU's are capable off. As the Intel i series is performing the same or worse! Either that or the engine in chrome 9/10 is vastly improved!
Core 2 Duo 2.66 @ 2.81Ghz
4Gb
Win 7 64Bit
of every damn site now needing a login to do anything.
Shopping sites are the worse, no I don't need an account, I want to buy this one item from you, oh no google checkout or paypal...well I'll go else where then.
Why? Why not use RTF, or in fact just plain text?
well no, that's the thing...yes I played it quite a bit, but not *that* much! didn't play
Same as Wolfenstien I know all the secrets on the first few levels, but again not played that in years.
But it gets released on a phone or latest console and I know exactly where to go:)
Thanks for that! I knew I recognized it as soon as I saw that 'squiggly' (well squiggly for doom) tunnel.
But fuck knows why my brain decides that remembering map layouts of game I last played 16 odd years ago is a good idea! Maybe it's because your using most of your senses and non-repetitive muscle movements??
Add
So for this page: http://goo.gl/pWiq.qr
A shame this, as a lot of the earlier reviews of the SED technology picture quality had it just about equalling CRT, but it was firmly beating Plasma, and obviously LCD was a distant 4th.
Oh well, maybe OLED can be ramped up in size and down in cost, as that doesn't do too bad in the PQ stakes.
tbh I think this is a good thing. Meamo died because there was just 3 devices that ever used it, so all the promise it had as an OS were stunted. With this descision MeeGo will *have* to evolve and at least keep up with Android and iOS.
Nokia have always had a problem with their ranges, they produce so many models that whats supposed to be high-end has less features than the middle phone of the other range...see the N and E ranges for quite a few examples of this.
This will give the ranges a consistent and global difference.
Having said all that, Symbian S60 and ^3 still has (and had for a while) features that other phones are only just getting!
Concerns about privacy they'll have by the dozen...maybe someone should also point out what a technological clusterf**k this would be.
They can't even convert a PDF to an easily accessible HTML page. How the hell would the they manage with the massive amount of raw data from Google, Bing, Yahoo, Ask, (do they even know how many search engines there are?) How would you deal with the false positives alone?
This is just as moronic as the UK government thinking its easy to just 'store' all comms for 3 months, in case the police needed it.
What they should be doing is making sure that the reporting methods are easy and universal accross the EU, that every EU memeber has the wording in its laws to take down host sites and to work with non-EU states to make sure that international sites can also be taken down quickly.
Then it can move to the much much harder issue of properly defining child porn, and making that standard. None of this wishwashy crap that would make Donald Duck illegal because he's got no pants on! Or locking up grandparents from taking photo's of their children.
No need to waste billions of our money on some half-assed badly implemented privacy invasion.
It's not online privacy that's broken. All that's changing is people's awareness (or more importantly lack of) of what privacy means in the digital connected world.
Street view is a good example, no one bothered to drive around the world taking 360 pictures of everything and logging the gps coords, so before Google did it, that information just wasn't accessible but more importantly it wasn't private either. By making it easily accesible to all, made people jump to outragous claims of privacy invasions. But afaik there isn't a single country where the roads aren't owned by the 'public'. So everyone has the right to go down a street and 'look' and so the drunks, cats in windows and people leaving sex stores with Black Mamba dongs where doing so in public and could have been seen by anybody. Just because Google 'looked' and stored what they saw, doesn't change this fact. If you don't want Google or anybody else to see what your doing, don't do it in a public or publicly visible space. You've never had the right to stop people looking through your windows, but you do have the right to block those windows, that's your choice.
The wifi mac/ssid issue is similar, you are publicly broadcasting those bits of information, anybody can retrieve them from the 'public' electromagnetic waves and store it. You decided to make those bits of data public when you chose to use WiFi tech, the fact you (and a lot of others) don't understand or care how WiFi works is irrelevant. Again you have the choice not to use WiFi.
Similar with FaceBook, you are choosing to publish information to a third-party. At the end of day it doesn't matter what privacy you thought you'd agreed to when you hit 'submit'. You've choosen to make it less private.
I think it boils down to: "People are slowly realising just because no-one gathered or analysed the information before, doesn't make that information private."
That's just illogical, if you allow on base
Sorry, but Open != Detailed Documentation any more than Closed does. See Mark Russinovich's blog for way too much detail about the Windows kernel and ecosystem.
I'd also argue the MSDN site is far more comprehensive and easy to use (if they'd stop pratting about with the colours and layout every other week) than any single source of linux docs (if there even is one)
MS do seem to realise that you can't write docs assuming the reader knows what the doc is about, unlike most OSS documentation that assumes way to much knowledge.
These IBM pages are very useful and a commendable activity and a good read for any one interested in *nix, or operating systems. But these are the exception rather than the general rule.
Agreed, its the only one that stays in the background, doesn't bother the user unless there's a problem.
Doesn't seem to need to many resources either.
Urm why block it? If its illegal, then get a court order and take it down. Arrest those responsible etc etc.
If its not illegal then it must be legal and then also be fine for public consumption.
But as people have pointed out numerous times, the governments don't want to block illegal content, they want to control access to legal content.
The UK had a similar responce after a large pedophilla case, I thought at the time I don't want you to block it, I want you to delete the content then find the scum and hang'em. In fact pedophilla is one of the few types of content that has fairly consistent global laws, and should be easy to prosecute for.
It does seem a rather ott response from the boss.
Our's tried a similar thing, but was slightly more reasonable and said one ear only...ie so you could still respond. luckily that seems to have been dropped now.
I would suggest you find out if there is an underlying reason, maybe he's had complaints of people ignoring the phones or something.
Neutrinos have bad breadth.
