Comment Re:yet if we did it (Score 1) 463
well to be fair, im sure a civil case is going to happen. Its just sick. I wonder if there will be any riots over this one
Nah. It was wrong, but people generally don't riot over the death of a rich dude.
well to be fair, im sure a civil case is going to happen. Its just sick. I wonder if there will be any riots over this one
Nah. It was wrong, but people generally don't riot over the death of a rich dude.
Pic of the wheel
http://www.garrettbelmont.com/...
The first time when I saw the wheels I was wondering why the hell they spend so much money to send up a robot to Mars and then equip that thing with such flimsy wheels
And I did post question here on
Obviously the engineers designing the wheels had just come off a Livin' The Low Life marathon and felt inspired.
open source, with a community following
Why? So if you find one that fits every other requirement but this one you will refuse to use it?
Derp,
Probably because if there is no community following it there is not going to be much in the way of development going on.
Contract with them. They destroy everything.
Oh no they don't destroy everything. They have tax records going back for a decade or more from both what you, your employer, and financial institutions reported and trust me they can pull these records out of the hat when it suits their purpose. (Such as when they decide to audit you.)
Heh. "Second Leaker" is a little less damaging to the NSA than "Persistent, undetected back door access".
It's a form of disinformation as misdirection, related to "plausible deniability" and "limited hangout".
Are you sure it's not a modified limited hangout?
If you steal the product you sell, then you aren't a monopoly.
I guess Microsoft has nothing to fear in that case.
It's not even the original list, so I'm not sure what you are so uppity about.
That's the list from AD&D "First Edition". Perhaps you're thinking of regular D&D or something else?
He lost a Will save.
The only real saving throw types are
All the rest are bullshit.
Except it isn't Google's business plan. Google sells advertising targeting to ad companies. Verizon is selling your data to data mining companies. Google would never sell your data because it's their core business to be the keepers of that data so they can sell targeted ads. Not that Google is altruistic, just that they are themselves the data miners so they are not going to share.
Google offers free services to compensate. Services people tend to find pretty valuable such as Android, Gmail and Search.
Verizon is going to offer "discounts for shopping, travel and dining" read: coupons (ie more advertising). Verizon is going to "anonymize" your data and sell it to anyone and everyone willing to pay.
I see the exchange of value in one business plan, and not the other.
Verizon is offering more than just the points. Your asymmetrical FIOS connection gets upgraded to symmetrical based on your download speed if you sign up. My 150/65 got upgraded to 150/150 and speedtest.net shows it is actually hitting 152/164 consistently. I'll take it, especially considering they could probably have sold the data with no compensation.
Apparently being Muslim is good enough for probable cause. So much for freedom of religion.
I'm pretty sure that the agencies in question did not tell these people they aren't free to be Muslims.
Nothing wrong with 'getting acquired' as a goal. Not everyone wants to run a big business. If I had a successful business and Google wanted it I'd sign so fast the ink would burn. Then I'd spend the rest of my life stress free.
At least until you move to Belize...
"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry
