Comment Re:Ashamed! (Score 4, Insightful) 265
"H-1Bs do not commit sabotage."
Absolutely, allowing foreign nationals access to your systems is COMPLETELY safe. Moreover, they don't get angry when you take away their livelihood.
"H-1Bs do not commit sabotage."
Absolutely, allowing foreign nationals access to your systems is COMPLETELY safe. Moreover, they don't get angry when you take away their livelihood.
law abiding citizens in NYC dont have guns, there are a shit ton of guns in NYC however
Granted Wikipedia is not authoritative, but it looks to me like law abiding NYC citizens may own handguns or long guns.
Sorry, but a "meme" is a picture of a humorous animal with a joke in Impact font at the top and bottom. The word used to mean something else, but that definition got outcompeted by one that was better at replication.
You're WAY off. Arial is the font of choice.
We have a lovely convention centre here in Vancouver, built and opened for the 2010 Olympics. In Bing maps unfortunately it is still at the piling stage
Bing bing bing! We have a wiener!
What tells a player a door is locked and will open, as opposed to a door that they will never open?
Why include a door in a game at all if it will never open. Isn't that really more of a "wall?"
No, really... this is getting nuts.
I get the whole general protection of the average citizen from crimes, but we really need to shrink the reach and scope of these bastards.
You make an interesting complaint but you provide no argument or evidence that the government doesn't have a good reason to propose this rule... Note the word propose... Doesn't mean it will actually get implemented. Don't let facts get in the way of your libertarian fantasy, though.
I think part of penguinisto's point is that there should be no need to come up with an argument against random bullshit like this. But perhaps you should read TFS since it presents the argument you ask for.
What? Militias aren't some Libertarian fantasy force. Militias are what countries with limited resources used in lieu of a standing military. They're also all but obsolete in a world where military technology has advanced to the point that private citizens can't be expected to field their own effective arms (at least no one I know owns a Javelin "just in case...".
Militias are what people formed in the revolutionary war when the people revolted against their own government.
What IS going to be effective? I'd argue that nothing done in relation to google glass, getting upset about it or being cool with it, will revive privacy.
I'd say businesses banning the device on their premises is a good start. Admittedly, I'm not full of ideas - but I'm sure complacency is not the answer.
And how about we quit acting like this is the end of privacy and not CCTVs or the NSA.
So, ignore it and maybe it will go away? I don't think that's going to be effective.
That said, naming names of an engineer is a really bad precedent. What is the goal GM is trying to achieve here.
I hope that was a rhetorical question. It's obvious they are trying to create a scapegoat.
Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.
