The long lines are what they are bombing now, terrorists targeting airports right now are thinking that rolling up with a suitcase filled with explosives in the middle of a large crowd waiting for security:

a) Shuts down the whole airport.
b) Inflicts more causalities than randomly crashing an airliner
c) Will make security spend massive amounts of money countering

Let''s review, TSA has made us less safe by offering us up as a larger and slower target. It is like putting security at the watering hole to make sure no one is a crocodile while lions eat everyone else who is waiting in line.

It was in at least 5 newspapers yesterday, Google it, I'm not your bitch.

I don't know ask them, they released over 50 of them last week and deported them into Afghanistan. Maybe to kill Americans?

The only current threat of nuclear war in the middle east comes from Israel, unless you have some other proof of a secret program somewhere? Iran has 50 years of oil left and its gone, they are currently developing a nuclear program, no one has shown it be anything but civilian.

Iran, last week, released nearly all of its Al Qaeda prisoners, so what the fuck are you talking about? Don't claim I'm misinformed when you don't read the damn newspaper. I'm not implying that Iran and Al Qaeda are buddies but that they are working together in this instance against the United States, is that really surprising?

A company I worked for left some USB sticks laying around our break room one weekend, us local IT guys and corporate were the only ones in on it, by the end of the day, 8 out of 10 of the USB sticks had been plugged in. One low-level manager, had 3 of them and when we came into his office, he was offloading porn and mp3s from his work computer unto them.

Iran has stepped up efforts at helping Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban and is now releasing all of its Al Qaeda terrorists back into the wilds of the Middle East, the question we should be asking, was this attack worth it if terrorism increased because of it? From what I have seen, no, we are now dealing with Iran supplying larger and larger munitions to the Taliban, 'Charlie Wilson's War' is going to have a sequel and this time the protagonist is going to be Iranian.

Reason is far more accurate than Fox, I've never heard of it having problems with numbers or falsifying quotes.

His father was black which according to my Tea Party father, his mother was a whore. My dad drove to the Beck rally, yeah, that whacko.

This is Slashdot, many of us don't watch TV.

The one where Beck claims to be one so he can sucked people into thinking he has economic, political and theological answers to all their problems, when in reality he doesn't understand the concepts involved between between the Rawlsian 'difference principle' and Nozick's 'entitlement theory'.

I miss the logical fallacy Nazis, they used to eat these freshman and drop outs for breakfast, while the rest of us were like tourists watching a lion eat a gazelle.

When was the last time Nozick had anything printed of his besides his Anarchy, State and Utopia? Do you even know who Nozick is, or do you get your libertarian views secondhand? Because that is what this survey is indicting you for, a lack of engaging with the source material, of understanding the nature of what is going on, not from any particular ideological viewpoint but understanding that is based on the bare facts. Foxnews gets the facts wrong, over and over again, Reason, The National Review and other libertarian and conservative news organizations don't have this problem, only Fox, that is what this study is getting at, comprehende?

Damn new moderation system. Have to reply to undo redundant score.

When even the latest and greatest 3D TVs only go up to 1080p and the vast majority of people playing games at 720p max who is going to buy a next gen console for a screen size that does not exist.